Danny Bateman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Couldn't a mod win last to post rather easily by posting and immediately locking the thread? Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Eat a bag of ding dongs 2 Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 17 hours ago, Danny Bateman said: Couldn't a mod win last to post rather easily by posting and immediately locking the thread? been done before on other forums. and it got real boring after i did it. Quote Link to comment
funhusker Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 On 4/10/2019 at 10:06 AM, methodical said: I think you're making a leap there, personally. The fact that I don't contribute nearly as much to the football forum doesn't mean it isn't my main interest here and why I joined the board originally. I read it to stay current on what is going on and what I would add, would there be anything I felt compelled to, has usually already been said. Where as P&R was interesting discussions with less of the same views as me. Quote Link to comment
NM11046 Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Feel like I should compliment you on your openness to inclusion here @Redux . Thanks for not leaving the gals out of your verbal assault. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 On 4/11/2019 at 6:21 PM, Danny Bateman said: Couldn't a mod win last to post rather easily by posting and immediately locking the thread? I threatened to do that when I was a Mod. I may have actually done it on an April 1st, now that I think about it. But I either unlocked it the next day or later that day. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted April 14, 2019 Share Posted April 14, 2019 On 4/11/2019 at 7:12 AM, Enhance said: All, we have already explicitly outlined the concept of inorganic post boosting in the OP of this thread. Please don't encourage it. Sorry, I was not aware of the inorganic posting rule. And that bit about valueless posts across multiple threads.......well, I have a name or two to point out but I won't. I should probably actually read all the rules sometime 1 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted April 14, 2019 Share Posted April 14, 2019 15 hours ago, NM11046 said: Feel like I should compliment you on your openness to inclusion here @Redux . Thanks for not leaving the gals out of your verbal assault. You call that a verbal assault? Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 It's cute I have a new eye roll stalker. Or the old one is back under a new name. Quote Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 On 4/11/2019 at 4:23 PM, Redux said: I actually don't agree with the 250 post count decision. While it will work at keeping out the uber trolls, it will also reinforce the echo chamber it can become. But not my call and not a forum I venture into often, so have at it. I also don't agree with it. Why was 250 decided on? It punishes those who post occasionally on topics of interest and don't just go post a bunch of non-sense all the time. How about basing it on how long you've been a member rather than post count? Seems to me like a better way to keep the trolls out. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 I guess 250 seems high? Maybe like 100 would be more reasonable. Or maybe a P&R tier level, like you can start posting in the general thread, people get a feel for you before you get unleashed on the main PR forum. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 9 hours ago, Decoy73 said: I also don't agree with it. Why was 250 decided on? It punishes those who post occasionally on topics of interest and don't just go post a bunch of non-sense all the time. How about basing it on how long you've been a member rather than post count? Seems to me like a better way to keep the trolls out. From page 1 of this thread: On 4/10/2019 at 9:25 AM, Enhance said: The figure was debated among the leadership team so using 'arbitrary' as an adjective here is lacking in context. 250 posts is enough activity to act as a hindrance to someone who wants to join the board and violate board rules in P&R. But, it's within grasp of someone who wants to be a consistent contributor, and it gives us an opportunity to gauge how that person may behave as a board member in general. 3 Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 On 4/11/2019 at 8:12 AM, Enhance said: All, we have already explicitly outlined the concept of inorganic post boosting in the OP of this thread. ICYMI : 15 minutes ago, Rusty Shackleford said: Guess I have to get my post count up to post everywhere. Nobody should put Nebraska in the top 25 because in 2 seasons they havent won 9 games. Even Bo Pelini could do that in one season. 1 Quote Link to comment
Rusty Shackleford Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Make a post count requirement then make it against rules to post to get count up cuz that makes sense! Quote Link to comment
Ulty Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Rusty Shackleford said: Make a post count requirement then make it against rules to post to get count up cuz that makes sense! I would interpret any actual discussion/comments in any of hundreds of threads to be okay, but repeatedly bumping threads like Last to Post Wins, Bump When Drunk, Recipes, etc would be frowned upon. But to be honest, at this point in the offseason, getting another 200 meaningful posts in Husker related topics is tough. But keep plugging away, establish a little credibility, let everyone see who you are, and you'll be at 250 before ya know it. 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.