Jump to content


** Scott Frost megathread all things SF***


brophog

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Landlord said:

 

 

He shouldn't be, and we shouldn't be either. That's lame as hell, distracts from/diminishes the amazing effort and accomplishments of the UCF team and players, and reeks of obsessive desperation.

 

Same with their messageboards. Everyone's saying they don't like us and they're nasty - that's because there are dozens of Nebraska fans going onto their messageboards talking smack to a G5 team who would beat us by 3 touchdowns and gloating about how we're going to steal their savior. I'd be rightfully pissed off too. 

Rivals is a completely different entity than here but I'll explain. On Soundoff,  I had to listen to a handful of Knight posters crap all over our program and state. I suspected one poster had multiple handles. I went to their home board and confirmed this suspicion. In the process I ran into a thread, about Nebraska, on their board. I politely answered three to four questions.  One fan who knows me from Soundoff was concerned of my motives. I explained to him i was finding handles and told him I wouldn't flame unless flamed upon. I was and so was out program. So troll and flame I did. And I have no regrets. You do you. I'll do me.

Link to comment

Sucks to see 'totally false' on front page of ESPN. It's like, for whatever reason, there are some people /groups (not counting UCF fans) that don't want Frost to Nebraska to happen. WTF is up with that? I am tired of sucking. One would think that apathy would set in, but nope, it's just year after year of more pain. 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Jeremy said:

Sucks to see 'totally false' on front page of ESPN. It's like, for whatever reason, there are some people /groups (not counting UCF fans) that don't want Frost to Nebraska to happen. WTF is up with that? I am tired of sucking. One would think that apathy would set in, but nope, it's just year after year of more pain. 

You think ESPN appreciated Nebraska's run from 93-97?  If it had been any other Blue Blood it would have been titled the most dominant run ever. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

9 minutes ago, Bruce1981 said:

You think ESPN appreciated Nebraska's run from 93-97?  If it had been any other Blue Blood it would have been titled the most dominant run ever. 

 

It sure seems like it, since they spent a lot of time talking about it and and commentating/comparing it during the National Championship game broadcast where Alabama was playing Notre Dame for their 3rd title in 4 years. Their metrics sites still rank the '95 team as the best ever. Can you offer anything for this myth other than conjecture?

 

 

50 minutes ago, Bruce1981 said:

So troll and flame I did. And I have no regrets. You do you. I'll do me.

 

In other words, you're exactly like the people you're criticizing, and your logic for it is akin to a 5 year old saying, "but they started it"?

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

For the people asking for the legalize on hiring Scott Frost.

Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer and I've never lived in Nebraska.

 

I'm almost positive Nebraska does not have a mandatory waiting period. Nebraska has changed head coaches three times since 2003. We'd remember if Nebraska had to wait X amount of days to officially hire someone.

 

If I'm wrong and there is a waiting period, then it's only three or four days. Either way, it isn't going to be an issue in hiring a new head coach.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...