Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 6 minutes ago, nic said: The students laughed at the professor’s answer…there is hope. And rightfully so! 1 Link to comment
sho Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 4 minutes ago, nic said: The students laughed at the professor’s answer…there is hope. Their is hope for the next generation. They also understand there is more to gender identification than just bone structure as well. The one that I am fascinated with, their is an AI software that can determine the race of a person based solely on the X-Ray and scientists to not know how it knows and it is alarmingly accurate. It throws out the old notion of 'black/white/brown doesn't matter, we are all the same underneath'. Clearly it's not true, but we don't know how to identify it yet. 1 Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 On 3/28/2023 at 7:31 PM, nic said: In general I would guess liberals dislike religion because of fake Christians, Patriotism because they are more likely to be globalist, and the poll also said tolerance was up. Hard work may be a toss up. Things went sideways when patriotism become defined by the Second Amendment and foreign military incursions. You could make the case that "all men are created equal," separation of church and state, and defending the underdog hews more closely to both the Founding Fathers and liberal leanings when it comes to patriotism. Tolerance is pretty much engraved on the Statue of Liberty. Hard work will always be its own reward, but you do have a generation that appears willing to sacrifice a certain amount of salary and ambition for a more personally-rewarding and less-stressful lifestyle. That's not the craziest thing in the world. Can't say I know any liberal parents lobbying against hard work per se, although I don't think any of them want their kids working on roofing crews or as field hands. I don't know a single liberal who identifies themselves as a globalist, or who even knows what the term is supposed to mean, 2 Link to comment
ZRod Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 45 minutes ago, sho said: Their is hope for the next generation. They also understand there is more to gender identification than just bone structure as well. The one that I am fascinated with, their is an AI software that can determine the race of a person based solely on the X-Ray and scientists to not know how it knows and it is alarmingly accurate. It throws out the old notion of 'black/white/brown doesn't matter, we are all the same underneath'. Clearly it's not true, but we don't know how to identify it yet. There's always been subtle evolutionary difference between ethnicities as far as bone structure, susceptibility to certain diseases, how alcohol affects them, avg height, etc. We're all somewhat unique, but no one is superior to another. Racism is still stupid AF. We're all human. 1 1 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 hour ago, Archy1221 said: This tweet give you a quick glimpse at how the crazy left views the judicial system in this country Ummm....do you disagree with this? 1 Link to comment
funhusker Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: Ummm....do you disagree with this? I think the hang up is on "prove innocence". Not prove guilt... 2 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Just now, funhusker said: I think the hang up is on "prove innocence". Not prove guilt... OK...I get that. I didn't catch it. But....oh well. There are one hell of a lot of people in the US that would use the same wordage without any thought of it....and many are conservative. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 6 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: Ummm....do you disagree with this? Absolutely and so should you 1 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: Absolutely and so should you Are you saying it based on "prove his innocence"? If so, see my last post. Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: 3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Are you saying it based on "prove his innocence"? Yep 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 4 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Yep Then see my last post. Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 I prefer science to maintain its integrity. Hardly a surprise that the hip structure made for child bearing would show a readily identifiable difference between males and females, and anthropologists/archeologists have had no trouble making that distinction in the past. The larger gender and sex identity discussion has little to do with this, and the science shouldn't bend to help it out. 2 Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 18 minutes ago, funhusker said: I think the hang up is on "prove innocence". Not prove guilt... The standard is "innocent until proven guilty." Is there any way Nancy Pelosi could have phrased it that wouldn't have fomented the same reaction? Just leave innocence and guilt out entirely, I guess, and say the "right to a fair trial." No Trump supporter would question the words "fair trial" right? 3 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 hour ago, nic said: The students laughed at the professor’s answer…there is hope. So that pile of bones is who that person was? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, Scarlet said: So that pile of bones is who that person was? Well, I went through my teens and 20s thinking my bone was who I was. Then I realized that disappointed too many people. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts