HS_Coach_C Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, The Murphinator said: Virginia Tech was already in the tournament. We have to worry about teams like Syracuse, UCLA, USC, Boise State, Washington, and Mississippi State. Probably, but Virginia Tech had an RPI of 57 before tonight and Nebraska's was 58. Their resume is definitely better, but we can use all the help we can get. Every year there is a team that plays itself out of the tournament in the last week and one that plays itself in. We need some teams to fall apart or we're going to the NIT. Also, of the teams you mentioned, only USC is considered in the tournament by Lunardi. We are currently not projected in, so teams in front of us need to lose. Beating Michigan might help us jump a team or two, but not five or six. Edited February 27, 2018 by HS_Coach_C Quote Link to comment
The Murphinator Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, HS_Coach_C said: Probably, but Virginia Tech had an RPI of 57 before tonight and Nebraska's was 58. Their resume is definitely better, but we can use all the help we can get. Every year there is a team that plays itself out of the tournament in the last week and one that plays itself in. We need some teams to fall apart or we're going to the NIT. Also, of the teams you mentioned, only USC is considered in the tournament by Lunardi. We are currently not projected in, so teams in front of us need to lose. Beating Michigan might help us jump a team or two, but not five or six. Yeah, but Boise State sure could play themselves in. As well as the rest of those teams. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 15 minutes ago, Moiraine said: Q1 means you beat a team in the top 75 in an away game. So there's nothing really contradictory there. There are several teams in the top 75 that aren't bubble teams. Take away that other crap and put it into real words. Kansas is credited with a “big” win which helps their case to be in the tournament and be a 1 seed, by beating a team that doesn’t deserve to be in the tournament according to most. Think about that without defining what the QUADs mean. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, ScottyIce said: Take away that other crap and put it into real words. Kansas is credited with a “big” win which helps their case to be in the tournament and be a 1 seed, by beating a team that doesn’t deserve to be in the tournament according to most. Think about that without defining what the QUADs mean. What "big" means here is beating a top 75 team on the road. That's what it means for all teams. People have assigned the word "big" to it, but maybe they shouldn't have. Not all "big" teams make it to the tournament. Before this year, it wouldn't have been considered a "big" win. Don't get me wrong, I think how tournament teams are decided is really lame, because the RPI formula is stupid. But Q1 wins, whether they're called "big" or not, means beating a top 75 team on the road, + 2 other options. The top 75 teams, those "big" teams, don't all make it into the tournament. I'm guessing the top 50 teams don't all make it into the tournament either due to the small conferences. I don't know the numbers. Another problem is margin of victory seems unimportant. We lost to top seed by 1 point and no one mentions it. Edited February 27, 2018 by Moiraine 1 Quote Link to comment
HS_Coach_C Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 42 minutes ago, The Murphinator said: Yeah, but Boise State sure could play themselves in. As well as the rest of those teams. Yes, the teams in the same position as us can't get ahead of us, but that won't be enough by itself. We also need teams ahead of us to drop. I see Texas and Baylor as two, we need a couple more. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 32 minutes ago, Moiraine said: What "big" means here is beating a top 75 team on the road. That's what it means for all teams. People have assigned the word "big" to it, but maybe they shouldn't have. Not all "big" teams make it to the tournament. Before this year, it wouldn't have been considered a "big" win. Don't get me wrong, I think how tournament teams are decided is really lame, because the RPI formula is stupid. But Q1 wins, whether they're called "big" or not, means beating a top 75 team on the road, + 2 other options. The top 75 teams, those "big" teams, don't all make it into the tournament. I'm guessing the top 50 teams don't all make it into the tournament either due to the small conferences. I don't know the numbers. Another problem is margin of victory seems unimportant. We lost to top seed by 1 point and no one mentions it. This is exactly correct. You can make an argument that the break points they chose are not correct but that doesn’t make it contradictory. Ever since I started hearing about the system earlier in the year It’s eeemed to me like there is too much separation based on the location of the game. I understand the sentiment that inning on the road is harder but Ithink they overshot. Only the Top 25 at home but the Top 75 on the road? That seems excessive to me. I’m not sure what the right numbers would be. Maybe Top 35 at home and Top 65 on the road or something like that. Not that it would change this particular argument but it seems more accurate to me. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 47 minutes ago, Moiraine said: What "big" means here is beating a top 75 team on the road. That's what it means for all teams. People have assigned the word "big" to it, but maybe they shouldn't have. Not all "big" teams make it to the tournament. Before this year, it wouldn't have been considered a "big" win. Don't get me wrong, I think how tournament teams are decided is really lame, because the RPI formula is stupid. But Q1 wins, whether they're called "big" or not, means beating a top 75 team on the road, + 2 other options. The top 75 teams, those "big" teams, don't all make it into the tournament. I'm guessing the top 50 teams don't all make it into the tournament either due to the small conferences. I don't know the numbers. Another problem is margin of victory seems unimportant. We lost to top seed by 1 point and no one mentions it. Next question: How do they determine the top 75? Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, ScottyIce said: Next question: How do they determine the top 75? RPI, which is a dumb metric, and the top 75 RPI teams don't all make the tournament. Nor do all of the top 60 I'm assuming. Again, I'm not arguing that they're doing this logically, but using their metric, calling Nebraska a top 75 team is not contradicting the statement that they aren't good enough to make the tournament. Nebraska has plenty of company there. Everyone from 55-75 has been a Q1 win for other teams. That doesn't mean they've done enough to get a bid. Edited February 27, 2018 by Moiraine 1 Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, seaofred92 said: I would like to see all bubble teams chances. Heard Mizzou only has like a 43% chance if they lose one of their final two games. Not sure where to find it though. Quote Link to comment
ECisGod Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 7 hours ago, ScottyIce said: Next question: How do they determine the top 75? I read somewhere that they picked 75 because no team with an RPI over 75 has ever made the tournament. Yes there have been teams with RPI's in the 70's that made it. 1 Quote Link to comment
VectorVictor Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, ECisGod said: I read somewhere that they picked 75 because no team with an RPI over 75 has ever made the tournament. Yes there have been teams with RPI's in the 70's that made it. Save for automatic qualifiers, right? Because there have been some stinkers that won their conference tourney and got an AQ bid that way that weren't even top 100 RPI, IIRC. Quote Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, VectorVictor said: Save for automatic qualifiers, right? Because there have been some stinkers that won their conference tourney and got an AQ bid that way that weren't even top 100 RPI, IIRC. And this is what should caution some fans following the first 4 out/next 4 out teams and their results. All it takes is like a San Diego team making a tourney run and suddenly the WCC is a conference that gets three bids instead of two(Zaga and St Mary’s). Other conference tourneys NEED to chalk out 1 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, PaulCrewe said: And this is what should caution some fans following the first 4 out/next 4 out teams and their results. All it takes is like a San Diego team making a tourney run and suddenly the WCC is a conference that gets three bids instead of two(Zaga and St Mary’s). Other conference tourneys NEED to chalk out Great minds.... Quote Link to comment
VectorVictor Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, PaulCrewe said: And this is what should caution some fans following the first 4 out/next 4 out teams and their results. All it takes is like a San Diego team making a tourney run and suddenly the WCC is a conference that gets three bids instead of two(Zaga and St Mary’s). Other conference tourneys NEED to chalk out It's almost as if we need to have a tournament (or playoff?) just for the P5 conferences, and then we can have some fun, meaningless games for the non-P5 schools to take on P5 schools that didn't quite make the tournament/playoff cut. And then we don't have to worry about these dirty non-P5 schools messing things up. /s Edited February 27, 2018 by VectorVictor 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.