Jump to content

Nebrasketball Game #32- Big Ten Tournament Quarterfinals- Michigan (Friday, March 2- 1:30 BTN)


What will the game result be?  

22 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Just now, ScottyIce said:

Eh I just don’t agree.

 

We beat Wisconsin twice and they just played Michigan State tight 2 times in 1 week.

 

We beat Minnesota when they were still healthy and untorn. 

 

We had Ohio State, Kansas beat without late lapses.

 

We played tough against Purdue when they were RED hot.

 

i just disagree with the notion that we beat s#!tty teams. WHOLEHEARTEDLY

 

You can disagree all you want.  You just managed to list three of our 22 wins this year in an attempt to disprove the "we beat bad teams" theory.  

 

So you really have no evidence to back up your claim.  You just want to believe it so you don't care about the facts.

  • Plus1 3
Link to post

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Haha    

Good to see some real discussion on this board. When someone presents facts against my opinion based argument, I too get my panties in a wad rather than reasonably replying and advancing the conversat

Miles is a lot of the problem because we don't run anything resembling an offense so we are very easy to guard.   I've been complaining about that for years but just noticed another level of

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, ScottyIce said:

Eh I just don’t agree.

 

We beat Wisconsin twice and they just played Michigan State tight 2 times in 1 week.

 

We beat Minnesota when they were still healthy and untorn. 

 

We had Ohio State, Kansas beat without late lapses.

 

We played tough against Purdue when they were RED hot.

 

i just disagree with the notion that we beat s#!tty teams. WHOLEHEARTEDLY

Wisconsin RPI: 111

Minnesota RPI: 163

 

The rest are losses. 

Edited by seaofred92
  • Plus1 1
Link to post
3 minutes ago, ScottyIce said:

Eh I just don’t agree.

 

We beat Wisconsin twice and they just played Michigan State tight 2 times in 1 week.

 

We beat Minnesota when they were still healthy and untorn. 

 

We had Ohio State, Kansas beat without late lapses.

 

We played tough against Purdue when they were RED hot.

 

i just disagree with the notion that we beat s#!tty teams. WHOLEHEARTEDLY

 

Just now, Mavric said:

 

You can disagree all you want.  You just managed to list three of our 22 wins this year in an attempt to disprove the "we beat bad teams" theory.  

 

So you really have no evidence to back up your claim.  You just want to believe it so you don't care about the facts.

 

Playing well or not, Wisconsin finished with a losing record.

Minnesota wasn't terrible when we beat them, but they also weren't deserving of being ranked.

Listing losses in an effort to argue we beat good teams isn't exactly helpful... we lost to good teams, even if they were close

  • Plus1 1
Link to post
9 minutes ago, Mavric said:

 

Because we've played a lot of bad teams.

And yet still won a lot of games. 

 

I am not saying Miles is great coach. He isnt. I just think the argument that this is all on Miles is silly.

 

People are so quick to throw it all on Miles everytime we lose. Yes, we could be way better on offense but with what we run we have had success. 

 

The guys had open looks and missed them. They got beat on screens and didnt close out. Michigan had better players and they made there shots.

 

 

Link to post

1 minute ago, Minnesota_husker said:

And yet still won a lot of games. 

 

I am not saying Miles is great coach. He isnt. I just think the argument that this is all on Miles is silly.

 

People are so quick to throw it all on Miles everytime we lose. Yes, we could be way better on offense but with what we run we have had success. 

 

The guys had open looks and missed them. They got beat on screens and didnt close out. Michigan had better players and they made there shots.

 

 

its fine because its just your opinion and were going to disagree on it. I just want to clarify I haven't only been dogging Miles when we lose. I've been dogging him the entire year because it was obvious to me we hadn't really improved as a team.

Link to post
10 minutes ago, ScottyIce said:

Eh I just don’t agree.

 

We beat Wisconsin twice and they just played Michigan State tight 2 times in 1 week.

 

We beat Minnesota when they were still healthy and untorn. 

 

We had Ohio State, Kansas beat without late lapses.

 

We played tough against Purdue when they were RED hot.

 

i just disagree with the notion that we beat s#!tty teams. WHOLEHEARTEDLY

I bet we don’t have those late lapses and losses with a better coach...

 

just sayin

Link to post
9 minutes ago, Mavric said:

 

You can disagree all you want.  You just managed to list three of our 22 wins this year in an attempt to disprove the "we beat bad teams" theory.  

 

So you really have no evidence to back up your claim.  You just want to believe it so you don't care about the facts.

Geez I had to cover the whole schedule? My bad.

Just now, RedSavage said:

I bet we don’t have those late lapses and losses with a better coach...

 

just sayin

That’s fine, I’m just saying what I saw with what he have

Link to post

2 minutes ago, seaofred92 said:

its fine because its just your opinion and were going to disagree on it. I just want to clarify I haven't only been dogging Miles when we lose. I've been dogging him the entire year because it was obvious to me we hadn't really improved as a team.

I agree with that.  I think the offense requires us to be physically better than the other team to win on most days.  When that's not the case, we fall flat almost every time.  There are better players this year, and some that fit the style better, but they just aren't a great team by any stretch of the imagination.

 

I'm still rooting for Miles, but at some point he's got to turn a corner and his team has to be more consistent. 

Link to post
Just now, ScottyIce said:

Dude, I don’t give a flying F about RPI. I watched the game. As many have said, Wisconsin with our resume is a big time 5 seed.

Nobody with our resume is a 5 seed. You might not care about the RPI but the fact of the matter is its a major component used in determining at large bid selections. We might as well be MTSU or Loyola (Chicago) right now. Those teams are 25+ win teams that if they don't win their conference tournaments are SOL because they haven't played anyone. We haven't played anyone either. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...