The Angry Violent Right

[NebraskaHarry]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

I’m happy I was able to teach you something then.  It certainly proves the Earth will change temperature regardless Of what we do.  Hint...it already has.  We may be able to change it slightly for good or bad but only in the minutiae compared to what nature will do on its own 

I know you think you know more than every credible scientist, but the dilemma is how Homo sapiens have contributed to Earth's changing temperature. You yourself see no human contribution to changing global temperatures. Probably much the same way you probably thought DDT didn't thin the eggs of birds or CFC's didn't damage the ozone layer. Your personal opinion lies within a political agenda and that's it. Your clearly picking and choosing the things you want to believe and ignoring everything else. Largely because I think it scares you. 

[Guy Chamberlin]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Oh and about those alarmist predictions that didn’t come true?  No mention of those?  
 

 

 

See earlier post.

[Archy1221]

2 hours ago, commando said:

we will all die someday anyway, so why charge people with murder when nature would eventually take it's course anyway?

Because it is against the law.   Why come up with dumb comparisons?  

[Archy1221]

58 minutes ago, NebraskaHarry said:

You yourself see no human contribution to changing global temperatures.

I said the opposite as you will notice below 

 

1 hour ago, NebraskaHarry said:

Largely because I think it scares you.

I’m not scared of a changing Earth.  The next 50 generations at a minimum of my family will be long gone before there is any hint of climate catastrophe threatening Human existence.  outside of a nuclear war.  

 

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

We may be able to change it slightly for good or bad

 

[Archy1221]

53 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

See earlier post.

Sorry I didn’t see where you addressed that  pesky Arctic Sea Ice that was supposed to be gone by now.  Or the Glaciers, or the famine, or the islands that were supposed to be underwater, or the parts of New York that were supposed to be under water.  

[NebraskaHarry]

11 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Sorry I didn’t see where you addressed that  pesky Arctic Sea Ice that was supposed to be gone by now.  Or the Glaciers, or the famine, or the islands that were supposed to be underwater, or the parts of New York that were supposed to be under water.  

Well, I guess everything's fine and nothing has really changed over the last 150 years.  

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

4 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

Sorry I didn’t see where you addressed that  pesky Arctic Sea Ice that was supposed to be gone by now.  Or the Glaciers, or the famine, or the islands that were supposed to be underwater, or the parts of New York that were supposed to be under water.  

 

I said I can't speak for the folks who gave specific dates for the apocalypse, but the fact that arctic sea ice is not "gone by now" hardly means it's not going alarmingly fast. That's like.....uhm....bringing a snowball to the Senate to dispute global warming.

 

Here, I'll do the :10 Google search for you to ignore.: 

 

Arctic sea ice?

 

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/147746/the-long-decline-of-arctic-sea-ice

 

Glacies? 

 

https://nsidc.org/glims/glaciermelt

 

 Underwater islands?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/10/five-pacific-islands-lost-rising-seas-climate-change

 

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/may/16/one-day-disappear-tuvalu-sinking-islands-rising-seas-climate-change#:~:text=“Tuvalu is sinking” is the,midway between Hawaii and Australia.

 

Famine? 

 

https://unfccc.int/news/un-warns-climate-change-is-driving-global-hunger#:~:text=12 September 2018%2C Bonn – Climate,Organization (FAO) this week.&text=Overall%2C the number of hungry,total of 821 million worldwide.

 

Doesn't look like New York City is underwater yet, and Snake Pliskin hasn't escaped from there, either. I'll keep you posted.

[teachercd]

I mean, the temps only had 3 ways to go

 

Up

Down

Stay the same.

 

And well, it wasn't going to stay the same.

 

I am not Doctor Science but...it was going to go up or down, that is it, period.  

[commando]

8 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

Because it is against the law.   Why come up with dumb comparisons?  

you said we should do nothing about climate change because it's inevitable.   so why do anything to prevent anything inevitable?

[RedDenver]

14 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

I literally went back and just showed you all the incorrect predictions. 

No you didn't. You made a bunch of statements without any supporting evidence.

[Archy1221]

27 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

No you didn't. You made a bunch of statements without any supporting evidence.

So you dispute them?   That’s bold 

[RedDenver]

Just now, Archy1221 said:

So you dispute them?   That’s bold 

You provided no evidence to dispute.

[Archy1221]

19 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

You provided no evidence to dispute.

So you dispute my statement?  

[RedDenver]

Just now, Archy1221 said:

So you dispute my statement?  

You made a whole bunch of statements that you claim were things said about climate change. Provide evidence for your claims.

[Archy1221]

1 minute ago, RedDenver said:

You made a whole bunch of statements that you claim were things said about climate change. Provide evidence for your claims.

Are you disputing them and saying I am making things up?  If so, I will provide the links.  If you don’t dispute them, it’s a waste of my time as You could do a 2-3 minute DuckDuckGo search and find them all laid out.
 

You seem like you would be old enough to remember the news of the day back then.  Certainly Al Gore if nothing else.