Blind QB poll

[olddominionhusker]

I think you can make an argument for any of them. Over the whole season I like #3. But, The last 4 games stats do swing it in favor of #2 IMO as the INTs have greatly decreased and overall production is best. 

 

Very interesting poll though!! Well done!

[JJ Husker]

I don’t know how you don’t pick QB2. Maybe I’m thinking wrong but if games played are equal, he has way more production than the other two. 

[olddominionhusker]

3 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

I don’t know how you don’t pick QB2. Maybe I’m thinking wrong but if games played are equal, he has way more production than the other two. 

17 giveaways vs. 7 and 4 for the other two. Turnovers can lose games

[JJ Husker]

16 minutes ago, olddominionhusker said:

17 giveaways vs. 7 and 4 for the other two. Turnovers can lose games

2700 yards and 7 TD’s will win a lot more games than 1800 yds and 1 TD or 1500 yds and 2 TD’s......

But like I said it depends if other things are equal, like the number of games.

 

Besides that, I think 2AM is QB2 and I think those turnovers will improve over the sample period.

[YellowShirt]

3 hours ago, Huskers93-97 said:

Are all the fumbles shown- fumbles lost? 

No it’s just fumbles. I believe fumbles lost looks like

QB1- 2

QB2 - 5

QB3- 1

[olddominionhusker]

5 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

2700 yards and 7 TD’s will win a lot more games than 1800 yds and 1 TD or 1500 yds and 2 TD’s......

But like I said it depends if other things are equal, like the number of games.

What stats are you quoting there? Those aren’t representative of the season or last 4 that are quoted unless I’m missing something. And having either 10 or 13 more turnovers is probably significant when it comes to getting the W. 

 

Over the last 4, yeah #2. 

 

Also, arguments aside, I don’t want any other QB leading this team other then the one we currently have

[Stumpy1]

QB3 would be my starter just going by the OP. 

[YellowShirt]

2 minutes ago, olddominionhusker said:

What stats are you quoting there? Those aren’t representative of the season or last 4 that are quoted unless I’m missing something. And having either 10 or 13 more turnovers is probably significant when it comes to getting the W

The turnover gap isn’t that large, fumbles quoted in OP isn’t the fumbles lost stat

[olddominionhusker]

1 minute ago, JimmyBuckets said:

The turnover gap isn’t that large, fumbles quoted in OP isn’t the fumbles lost stat

It’s still pretty significant. Total giveaways would be 12 vs. 6 vs. 3

[Waldo]

Give me the running QB in college. If you’re not a perennial top 10 team, it’s (almost) a necessity to have a mobile QB to consistently compete. 

[olddominionhusker]

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

Give me the running QB in college. If you’re not a perennial top 10 team, it’s (almost) a necessity to have a mobile QB to consistently compete. 

In general I agree. It puts more

pressure on the defense for sure

[Cdog923]

Since the poll is almost over, I'll update it to show the actual names as opposed to just QBs 1, 2 and 3. 

 

It's an interesting exercise to see what each of us values in a QB stat line, and a nice comparison between the #1 overall QB in last year's class vs. someone a lot of us feel like will add pieces to the trophy case at Nebraska, with another really impressive freshman QB thrown in for good measure. 

[Cdog923]

Since the poll is almost over, I'll update it to show the actual names as opposed to just QBs 1, 2 and 3. 

 

It's an interesting exercise to see what each of us values in a QB stat line, and a nice comparison between the #1 overall QB in last year's class vs. someone a lot of us feel like will add pieces to the trophy case at Nebraska, with another really impressive freshman QB thrown in for good measure. 

[shyndy]

For me it was really tough between 2 and 3 but really just the turnover difference.  It’s still tough just from the stats bc you don’t see ypg and ypa, and is it fumbles or fumbles lost?

[Huskers93-97]

2 hours ago, JimmyBuckets said:

No it’s just fumbles. I believe fumbles lost looks like

QB1- 2

QB2 - 5

QB3- 1

So that makes QB 2 look even better as far as overall td to turnover ratio