Jump to content


Recommended Posts


17 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:

 

I didn't limit my statement to.sexually explicit content. The kids can go online and read anything and everything being pulled from the library. The kids are an excuse. 

Fantastic feature when the pre-teens are pulling information relevant to their education and maturity.   As they grow, they're exposed to much more.  And, ideally, parents are locked in engaging them through the process.  

 

This very site's COC rule #4 differentiates kids from certain content.   

 

Flipping it, what is the root of your passion to have pre-teens/kids exposed to sexually explicit material condoned/missed by/championed/other by the public schooling system?

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
58 minutes ago, DefenderAO said:

Flipping it, what is the root of your passion to have pre-teens/kids exposed to sexually explicit material condoned/missed by/championed/other by the public schooling system?

 

 

Nobody is passionate about providing kids with porn.

 

Most just reject the premise that this is actually an existing issue in schools whatsoever outside of highly anomalous one-off instances.

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Lorewarn said:

 

 

Nobody is passionate about providing kids with porn.

 

Most just reject the premise that this is actually an existing issue in schools whatsoever outside of highly anomalous one-off instances.

Some are taking the angle of what was presented isn't really that bad...

 

On the other side, no one is touting book burning party while kids are cocooned until the age of 40.

 

 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

2 hours ago, DefenderAO said:

Fantastic feature when the pre-teens are pulling information relevant to their education and maturity.   As they grow, they're exposed to much more.  And, ideally, parents are locked in engaging them through the process.  

 

This very site's COC rule #4 differentiates kids from certain content.   

 

Flipping it, what is the root of your passion to have pre-teens/kids exposed to sexually explicit material condoned/missed by/championed/other by the public schooling system?

 

Flipping it, why is your mind fixated on sexually explicit material and children? I already said my statement was not confined to said content yet you continue to navigate the conversation in that direction. 

  • Plus1 2
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:

 

Flipping it, why is your mind fixated on sexually explicit material and children? I already said my statement was not confined to said content yet you continue to navigate the conversation in that direction. 

You can go back multiple pages and see the dialogue progression.  

  • TBH 1
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, DefenderAO said:

You can go back multiple pages and see the dialogue progression.  

 

You quoted and responded to me. I've posted twice. Anything said not by me, is not germane to your response to my post. Your response, redirected the conversation to children and explicit content after I specifically stated my comment was not limited to said content. Frankly, your continued attempts to link the two subjects and redirect every response back to those two subjects is disturbing. 

  • Plus1 2
  • Fire 1
Link to comment

25 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:

 

You quoted and responded to me. I've posted twice. Anything said not by me, is not germane to your response to my post. Your response, redirected the conversation to children and explicit content after I specifically stated my comment was not limited to said content. Frankly, your continued attempts to link the two subjects and redirect every response back to those two subjects is disturbing. 

 

My response to you was/is consistent as my response to the collective here.  We're in an education thread, and I posted videos of the education system failing young children.  

 

Sexually explicit material to pre-teens is pure filth.  Disgusting.

 

Your contribution: "Why do you keep connecting the two?  You're good with this?"

 

That's your cut?

 

Edit:  It's not worth it.  Just sad.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, DefenderAO said:

 

My response to you was/is consistent as my response to the collective here.  We're in an education thread, and I posted videos of the education system failing young children.  

 

Sexually explicit material to pre-teens is pure filth.  Disgusting.

 

Your contribution: "Why do you keep connecting the two?  You're good with this?"

 

That's your cut?

 

Let me tee up your 3rd post:  

 

Give me a one sentence statement about what you think I believe about the subject.  Put passion into it and consider, or not, my tens+ of prior position statement in this thread.  

 

9 minutes ago, DefenderAO said:

Make it a charm.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I've asked you, you might need to ask yourself. 

 

"Flipping it, why is your mind fixated on sexually explicit material and children?"

 

"Put passion into it and consider, or not, my tens+ of prior position statement in this thread."

 

 

464b078a-fc5c-4357-85c2-6241378796f8_text(1).gif.172505d7f481a6df6a3ba1acdf14055d.gif

 

 

 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:

 

 

I've asked you, you might need to ask yourself. 

 

"Flipping it, why is your mind fixated on sexually explicit material and children?"

 

"Put passion into it and consider, or not, my tens+ of prior position statement in this thread."

 

 

464b078a-fc5c-4357-85c2-6241378796f8_text(1).gif.172505d7f481a6df6a3ba1acdf14055d.gif

 

 

 

Read if you're truly interested.  

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Born N Bled Red said:

 

You quoted and responded to me. I've posted twice. Anything said not by me, is not germane to your response to my post. Your response, redirected the conversation to children and explicit content after I specifically stated my comment was not limited to said content. Frankly, your continued attempts to link the two subjects and redirect every response back to those two subjects is disturbing. 

As lazy and disingenuous as asserting police officers are disturbed given their infatuation with crime. 

 

:lol:
 

 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...