Caveman Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, knapplc said: It's not an assault until it's shown to be in court. To date, she hasn't pressed charges. Let's be careful of the words we use here. These situations can be far worse or far less severe than they seem at first blush. Let's wait until the second wave of news hits. We haven't heard from Washington yet. There's plenty of time to kick the guy off the team. Let's be sure we need to before we convict him here. You're right. I may have been a bit hasty. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, knapplc said: It's not an assault until it's shown to be in court. To date, she hasn't pressed charges. Let's be careful of the words we use here. These situations can be far worse or far less severe than they seem at first blush. Let's wait until the second wave of news hits. We haven't heard from Washington yet. There's plenty of time to kick the guy off the team. Let's be sure we need to before we convict him here. And, the text sent to her was bad. However, let's remember, he wasn't the one that was video taped having sex with her or video taping it. He was not involved (as far as we know) until he received the video on his phone. 1 Quote Link to comment
Popular Post StPaulHusker Posted February 11, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted February 11, 2019 Listen. Even if charges aren't filed against him, he is a very low character guy sending the video to the girl. That alone should be enough to have him off the team. 10 1 3 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: And, the text sent to her was bad. However, let's remember, he wasn't the one that was video taped having sex with her or video taping it. He was not involved (as far as we know) until he received the video on his phone. In which case, he's guilty. 2 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Cdog923 said: In which case, he's guilty. No. If I down load a naked picture of a 13 year old girl and text it to you, you aren't immediately guilty of child porn. 1 Quote Link to comment
Ulty Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, QMany said: But this part isn't a good look: An investigator on the case said the Sheriff’s Department has been unable to interview Washington during the months-long investigation after making requests through the University of Nebraska’s Athletic Department, as well as Washington’s former attorney, Jon Bruning, who is the former Attorney General of Nebraska. Nothing involving Jon Bruning is good. Why is that scumbag a part of this? 1 1 Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Cdog923 said: In which case, he's guilty. Receiving it on his phone isn't the guilty part. Keeping it and sending it to the girl and calling her a hoe is the guilty part. Just now, Ulty said: Nothing involving Jon Bruning is good. Why is that scumbag a part of this? I think you've answered your own question 3 1 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, BigRedBuster said: No. If I down load a naked picture of a 13 year old girl and text it to you, you aren't immediately guilty of child porn. The second after he opened it, when he didn't contact the police, he was guilty. 2 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Cdog923 said: The second after he opened it, when he didn't contact the police, he was guilty. No, when he sent it on to her is when he was guilty. If I text you that same picture, and you immediately delete it, you still aren't guilty of child porn....even though you didn't call the police. 1 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ulty said: Nothing involving Jon Bruning is good. Why is that scumbag a part of this? That's a very good question. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, StPaulHusker said: Keeping it and sending it to the girl Legally wrong. 1 minute ago, StPaulHusker said: calling her a hoe Morally wrong. The question has to be, what legal penalty will he face? And what's an appropriate team punishment for that legal penalty? Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, BigRedBuster said: No, when he sent it on to her is when he was guilty. If I text you that same picture, and you immediately delete it, you still aren't guilty of child porn. He kept it on his phone. Regardless of the intent, he had child pornography in his possession. 1 Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Cdog923 said: The second after he opened it, when he didn't contact the police, he was guilty. I don't believe that's how the law works, but in this case, it doesn't really matter. 2 Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 was hoping he had grown up....its a shame that this is what is going to potentially ruin his life. just pure stupidity 3 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, Cdog923 said: He kept it on his phone. Regardless of the intent, he had child pornography in his possession. Now you're getting closer. Question....and it may not have a huge bearing on the outcome. But, how old was he when this was happening? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.