Jump to content


Maurice Washington Faces Charges


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, knapplc said:

 

It's not an assault until it's shown to be in court. To date, she hasn't pressed charges.

 

Let's be careful of the words we use here. These situations can be far worse or far less severe than they seem at first blush.  Let's wait until the second wave of news hits. We haven't heard from Washington yet.

 

There's plenty of time to kick the guy off the team. Let's be sure we need to before we convict him here.

 

You're right. I may have been a bit hasty.

Link to comment

1 minute ago, knapplc said:

 

It's not an assault until it's shown to be in court. To date, she hasn't pressed charges.

 

Let's be careful of the words we use here. These situations can be far worse or far less severe than they seem at first blush.  Let's wait until the second wave of news hits. We haven't heard from Washington yet.

 

There's plenty of time to kick the guy off the team. Let's be sure we need to before we convict him here.

 

And, the text sent to her was bad.  However, let's remember, he wasn't the one that was video taped having sex with her or video taping it.  He was not involved (as far as we know) until he received the video on his phone.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

And, the text sent to her was bad.  However, let's remember, he wasn't the one that was video taped having sex with her or video taping it.  He was not involved (as far as we know) until he received the video on his phone.

 

In which case, he's guilty. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

3 minutes ago, QMany said:

 

But this part isn't a good look:

An investigator on the case said the Sheriff’s Department has been unable to interview Washington during the months-long investigation after making requests through the University of Nebraska’s Athletic Department, as well as Washington’s former attorney, Jon Bruning, who is the former Attorney General of Nebraska.

 

 

Nothing involving Jon Bruning is good. Why is that scumbag a part of this?

  • Thanks 1
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Cdog923 said:

 

In which case, he's guilty. 

Receiving it on his phone isn't the guilty part.  

 

Keeping it and sending it to the girl and calling her a hoe is the guilty part.

Just now, Ulty said:

 

Nothing involving Jon Bruning is good. Why is that scumbag a part of this?

I think you've answered your own question

  • Plus1 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Just now, BigRedBuster said:

 

No, when he sent it on to her is when he was guilty.


If I text you that same picture, and you immediately delete it, you still aren't guilty of child porn.

 

He kept it on his phone. Regardless of the intent, he had child pornography in his possession. 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...