Hunter94 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Hedley Lamarr said: but we dont know if he kept it on his phone or if he recently received it. he sent it, didn't he? that's the whole point. he is guilty of distribution. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, Dbqgolfer said: If MO sent this video back to the girl, he basically "slut-shamed" a victim of sexual assault. If he knew it was sexual assault. 2 Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, Moiraine said: No one's sure of that. Ok. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Enhance said: It's a skeleton statement. These are often released in the immediacy of a situation to say "we're aware." It doesn't necessarily mean anything, but it could mean something. Saying it's odd or strange is equally odd and strange to me. I don't think there's enough there to take anything away from it at all. Plus, UNL has to be smart. Anything said in a public statement can come back to bite them in the a$$. The last thing they or any entity would want to do is say the wrong thing in a rush. i am sure everyone involved is going to lawyer up, this program sure does not need a black eye! Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Quote On Sunday, Washington's attorney, John C. Ball, issued this statement: “This is a situation involving an inappropriate cell phone video. The allegations are that Mr. Washington sent that video to his high school girlfriend. Mr. Washington did not make the video, nor does he appear in the video. The incident is alleged to have taken place in California, several years ago. Mr. Washington will continue to be fully cooperative with the authorities in this situation. We are in contact with those authorities, and are in the process of making arrangements to move forward and resolve this matter. Mr. Washington has confidence in our justice system, and knows that he can rely on the fundamental constitutional rights of due process and the presumption of innocence.” https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 It's a good thing athletic departments, unlike message boards, aren't run on hysterics. This thread has been crazy. Some people here really need to take a breath. 6 Quote Link to comment
Dbqgolfer Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Moiraine said: If he knew it was sexual assault. Correct, but if it was his former girlfriend, I assume he knew she was only 15. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hunter94 said: he sent it, didn't he? that's the whole point. he is guilty of distribution. NOT IF HE DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS 15 IN THE VIDEO he also didnt send it to the world. All we know is SOMEONE sent the girl the video of her having a threesome from several years ago Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Dbqgolfer said: Correct, but if it was his former girlfriend, I assume he knew she was only 15. how is he suppose to know she is 15 in the video? Maybe he received the video shortly before he sent it to her? We dont know squat yet as I have said over and over again. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 From The World-Herald's report. I was trying to figure out what California does in terms of punishment for these types of cases. Still trying to track it all down but this is what happened to one person connected to it all: Quote One boy connected with the assault was given probation for distribution of child pornography after he sent a recording of the video to classmates, according to NBC Bay Area. He was not charged with sexual assault at the time. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, Enhance said: So, interesting note from The World-Herald's report. I was trying to figure out what California does in terms of punishment for these types of cases. Still trying to track it all down but this is what happened to one person connected to it all: I dont think that is the charge that would stick. the "revenge porn" seems more likely to stick if either does. Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hedley Lamarr said: NOT IF HE DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS 15 IN THE VIDEO he also didnt send it to the world. All we know is SOMEONE sent the girl the video of her having a threesome from several years ago The video was taken in 2016 and he, along with several other people, received it in 2016. I don't think there is a gray area in him knowing how old she was. 3 Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 What ever happened with Eichorst's son, and sick s#!t he was involved with? Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, B.B. Hemingway said: What ever happened with Eichorst's son, and sick s#!t he was involved with? Hell of a sugue 2 Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, StPaulHusker said: The video was taken in 2016 and he, along with several other people, received it in 2016. I don't think there is a gray area in him knowing how old she was. He's reaching a bit, no? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.