Jump to content


Maurice Washington Faces Charges


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said:

Wrong, he has not been charged.   It still under investigation. 

According to NBC Bay Area, where the story first broke, he's being charged with a misdemeanor and a felony.

 

We'll see if those charges stick, but that's not a good look. 

 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html

 

Link to comment

5 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

I was under the impression we were similar ages. Did smart phones exist when you were 18?

 

I am 100% sure I would have received dick pics from my 18 year old boyfriend when I was 16 if smartphones had existed back then.

I didn’t have a smartphone but I did have a digital camera, computer, and internet and was willing to put some work in to attain 8.8/10 rating on ratemyrack.com. As I’ve said above, my 18-24 years would have been much worse had I come of age in 2010+.  

Link to comment
5 hours ago, The Dude said:

Case in point.  Heh.

 

I was 18 in the internet age.  You know what the easiest thing in the world was?  Not being in possession of child pornography.

 

Did you ever save any picture you saw on the internet ever?

 

You've been in possession of "child porn".

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

According to NBC Bay Area, where the story first broke, he's being charged with a misdemeanor and a felony.

 

We'll see if those charges stick, but that's not a good look. 

 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html

 

 

The case was referred to a judge in mid-December. Unless it happened recently, charges have not yet been filed. They're anticipating charges in that article, likely because a source in the DA has told them they're pending, but until the judge issues the order, no charges.

Link to comment

4 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

According to NBC Bay Area, where the story first broke, he's being charged with a misdemeanor and a felony.

 

We'll see if those charges stick, but that's not a good look. 

 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html

 

 

Girl: "Please don't use my last name."

 

News channel: "No problem!"

 

Girl: "Thanks!"

 

News channel: *proceeds to paste her picture in the article*

 

 

Link to comment

There is something inherently wrong with considering one 16 year old in possession of another 16 year old's (their girlfriend or boyfriend) picture/video as being guilty of child pornography. We give these kids smart phones, oftentimes before they are even teenagers, and then some act shocked and disgusted and outraged when immature people do immature things with that technology. Yet some of these same people simply call laws against marijuana stupid and ill advised. Tar and feather one while ignoring/laughing about the other. I think I'll need a much taller horse to see the world the way some of you do.

  • Plus1 5
Link to comment

1 minute ago, JJ Husker said:

There is something inherently wrong with considering one 16 year old in possession of another 16 year old's (their girlfriend or boyfriend) picture/video as being guilty of child pornography. We give these kids smart phones, oftentimes before they are even teenagers, and then some act shocked and disgusted and outraged when immature people do immature things with that technology. Yet some of these same people simply call laws against marijuana stupid and ill advised. Tar and feather one while ignoring/laughing about the other. I think I'll need a much taller horse to see the world the way some of you do.

I have been having the same response when someone calls this child porn....a 60 yr old man can watch dirty videos of 18 yr olds all day every day and never have a legal issue but an 18 yr old senior in HS cant have a 15 or 16 yr old picture or video of his gf/ex or whatever. One seems way more disgusting to me. 

  • Plus1 5
Link to comment
44 minutes ago, Hedley Lamarr said:

I'm so happy none of you ever saw a nude teenager when you were a teen. Many of you lived very boring teenage years 

 

I've searched for an hour for the most appropriate eye roll gif to post in response to this, but there are too many, and they wouldn't fit the maximum size requirements. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Hedley Lamarr said:

I have been having the same response when someone calls this child porn....a 60 yr old man can watch dirty videos of 18 yr olds all day every day and never have a legal issue but an 18 yr old senior in HS cant have a 15 or 16 yr old picture or video of his gf/ex or whatever. One seems way more disgusting to me. 

 

 

I'm guessing many of the people throwing around the label trying to force it to tell the entire story are grown ups who watch 18 year old porn stars. If we're talking about morality, I don't see much of a difference.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...