Jump to content


Maurice Washington Faces Charges


Recommended Posts


26 minutes ago, Billsantosa said:

My question for this young lady is...

 

After everything that has happened to you, why do you have an axe to grind for your ex that you apparently felt good enough about to reach out and congratulate on social media?

 

Is it just because he shamed you with that video or is there more to it?

 

There had to be others that shamed you, why not them? Why just your ex?

Why reach out to Mo who used to try to make her watch the video?  Asking him to resend the video, after not seeing it the first time because her mother intercepted it is kind of like asking to be victimized again. The description of the video content isn’t what I thought it would be given that the alleged victim “froze”.  Some things I find odd.

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

This is a lengthy thread about some serious issues, and most of us are having civilized conversations using reasoning, logic, facts (when available), and curiosity, with the occasional bit of levity. Why do some johnny-come-latelies feel the need to start throwing crap around without any intent to contribute to the discussion?

 

One of the lessons learned in this situation is to not be an a$$h@!e to other people.

 

So in this thread, don't be an a$$h@!e.

 

@Guiness1515 (and a few others), please contribute like an adult or GTFO

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

We have to all remember that for the more serious charges Maurice could face here, the question of whether the video of the three teens was assault or not does not actually matter. Going into the weeds on this on a message board probably scratches the itch to just discuss s*** on the internet, but it's not as relevant as a lot of people here think it is to Mo's overall fate.

 

Remember that the felony child porn charges can be levied no matter what the answer to that question is. The circumstances surrounding that issue are probably much more relevant if/when the girl's family presses charges under the 'Revenge Porn' blanket.

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

18 minutes ago, 4skers89 said:

Why reach out to Mo who used to try to make her watch the video?  Asking him to resend the video, after not seeing it the first time because her mother intercepted it is kind of like asking to be victimized again. The description of the video content isn’t what I thought it would be given that the alleged victim “froze”.  Some things I find odd.

 

 

If her mother intercepted the message/video, and told the daughter not to watch it... isn’t it just attempted revenge porn? Honestly? He would’ve still been in possession of course.

 

There are some holes here it feels like. I thought her quote was along the lines of “seeing that video and being reminded of it took me back to a dark place.” I’m paraphrasing.

 

Also, why did Mom have an app on her daughters phone to intercept all messages? Sounds like others had harassed her prior, why didn’t they go after them?

 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, teachercd said:

Just like if I found out that the car I drove was the car of most serial killers (It probably is, I drive an off-white windowless van) it would not make me get rid of my ride.

I've been very busy at work and this thread seems to add posts quickly.  So....I've not read many of them.

 

But, this one caught my eye. Just for clarification, you only use this to transport candy and puppies.....right?

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

4 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

So you're the morality cop from some other team come here to tell us Huskers how to properly react to this situation.

 

That's pretty arrogant, especially considering this thread is 20 pages of Husker fans OK with him getting booted if the situation warrants.  But whatever makes you feel good about yourself, I guess.

I thought it was pretty obvious hes an Irish fan.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, 10_point_buck said:

Crazy to think, in the name of football, how many people can justify and defend what he "allegedly" did.  Win at all costs comes to mind.   Filtering out these types of people, before they ever step on campus would be even better.  

Wth are you talking about? You put allegedly in quotes and basically make the point. People arent defending the action, they are defending intent and people crucifying him before we know intent and real truth.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, PasstheDamnBallGuy said:

I've been kind of wondering something. One source that showed the full conversation showed her requesting him to send the video again. Is that not a request for a video of CP? If it was the girl not really an issue but if that was actually the mom who has access to her texts and she was trying to get proof can she not be legally help responsible for that?

 

It's another interesting question. I quoted that exchange a few pages ago.  If she's offended by the video, why ask him to send it again? Was she doing it because she was taunting him back (because he seemed to be taunting her), was she trying to get evidence, was that not even her and it was the police using her phone?  Hard to say.

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...