Jump to content


Maurice Washington Faces Charges


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, teachercd said:

He won't answer the question.  Trust me, we all know this type.  

 

He pretends that a 50 year old that is taking pictures of a 5 year old girl and selling those naked pictures is the same as a HS girl sending a boob picture...

 

I don't blame him, I would not answer it either.  He/She pained him/herself into a corner.

 

He/She also went with the "I hope you are not a parent" card...

 

Dude, I am around HS kids all day long...trust me..."your" little perfect princess...is not what you think.

You are a sad little man who would never act tough away from a keyboard.  If you are too lazy to go back and read, thats your issue.  

Link to comment

Just now, HuskerPowerVA said:

You are a sad little man who would never act tough away from a keyboard.  If you are too lazy to go back and read, thats your issue.  

Good lord, you think that was acting tough?  Dude, I am a HUGE sissy, trust me, I was not trying to act tough.  I also am pretty sad, both emotionally and in the way you meant it.  I am also super lazy (not sure that is an issue but no big deal)

 

So...I am guessing then that you think a 50 year old man that has tricked a 5 year old girl into playing dress up, takes pictures of her, sells them...is EXACTLY the same as a HS girl taking a picture of her boobs and sending it out.

 

Cool...Works for me!  We all gotta believe in something.

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
1 minute ago, teachercd said:

Good lord, you think that was acting tough?  Dude, I am a HUGE sissy, trust me, I was not trying to act tough.  I also am pretty sad, both emotionally and in the way you meant it.  I am also super lazy (not sure that is an issue but no big deal)

 

So...I am guessing then that you think a 50 year old man that has tricked a 5 year old girl into playing dress up, takes pictures of her, sells them...is EXACTLY the same as a HS girl taking a picture of her boobs and sending it out.

 

Cool...Works for me!  We all gotta believe in something.

Like they say, some of the dumbest kids in school went on to teach public school.  Glad you sustained the image.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, HuskerPowerVA said:

Number four - Yes, it was something he sent, he sent child pornography.  Maybe you don't know that a 15 year old qualifies.  He is either stupid or didn't care.

 

Maybe you don't know this, but just because an event can "technically" can be defined as something prohibited by law, simply because certain boxes can be checked off, doesn't mandate that a specific charge needs to be filed.

 

Circumstances and context are also taken into consideration.

 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

14 minutes ago, teachercd said:

He won't answer the question.  Trust me, we all know this type.  

 

He pretends that a 50 year old that is taking pictures of a 5 year old girl and selling those naked pictures is the same as a HS girl sending a boob picture...

 

I don't blame him, I would not answer it either.  He/She pained him/herself into a corner.

 

He/She also went with the "I hope you are not a parent" card...

 

Dude, I am around HS kids all day long...trust me..."your" little perfect princess...is not what you think.

You would do well for yourself to just step away from the screen and maybe correct some papers. 

Link to comment
Just now, HuskerPowerVA said:

Like they say, some of the dumbest kids in school went on to teach public school.  Glad you sustained the image.  

Amen to that!  And thank you for the compliment about sustaining...

 

Interesting you would use the term "image" though...I mean...you seem to have a problem with "images" . Wink.

 

 

Just now, CapoValley said:

You would do well for yourself to just step away from the screen and maybe correct some papers. 

I teach pottery....no papers.

  • Plus1 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment

1 minute ago, Red Dead Redemption said:

 

Maybe you don't know this, but just because an event can "technically" can be defined as something prohibited by law, simply because certain boxes can be checked off, doesn't mandate that a specific charge needs to be filed.

 

Circumstances and context are also taken into consideration.

 

Its called the judicial process.  It was a felony.  So now do I have to explain the investigatory process: probable cause, what a preliminary hearing does,  and the arriagnment?   It should have been filed.  If a deal is made or a trail finds the facts call for lesser punishment or none at all is when that discretion is made.  

Link to comment
1 minute ago, HuskerPowerVA said:

Its called the judicial process.  It was a felony.  So now do I have to explain the investigatory process: probable cause, what a preliminary hearing does,  and the arriagnment?   It should have been filed.  If a deal is made or a trail finds the facts call for lesser punishment or none at all is when that discretion is made.  

Thanks LA LAW...

 

What Trail do you think they will use?  Cumberland? 

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...