mnhusker Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I would love to see MO back on the team. I figure this means his CA charges worked out and he got his crap together for the team. His biggest challenge may be the team expectations. The CA stuff may work it's self out. Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 30 minutes ago, EZ-E said: Nothing happened on saturday. Just the things I was hearing changed tune. Gotcha. Wondering if that's just hearing about all of the steps he would have to take, I imagine it's a lot. Quote Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I’ve said it for a while, it’s just best to move on. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Savage Husker said: Greg Sharpe was on Nick Handley’s show, I think Friday, and Sharpe wasn’t holding his breath. Said the expectations of what was set out for him is a tough task which he didn’t have confidence would be achieved. If you also read the tea leaves with scholarship numbers, Betts being allowed to sign scream that Mo is not expected to be on scholarship next semester 1 Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 1 hour ago, EZ-E said: If you also read the tea leaves with scholarship numbers, Betts being allowed to sign scream that Mo is not expected to be on scholarship next semester They talked to Mo on Thursday and the Betts news broke on Thursday. I wish Mo well, I hope the findings of his criminal case go in his favor (or in any case, that justice prevails), and if he doesn’t end up back on the team and there is a chance for him to play still that it’s with ASU - if Herm can help him out with a fresh start. I know we are better with him, but I also believe we can win as many games without him. 1 Quote Link to comment
UniversalMartin Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 Cut ties... 1 Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 2 hours ago, UniversalMartin said: Cut ties... And Merry Christmas to you! Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 3 hours ago, UniversalMartin said: Cut ties... With all the lies you’ve been living in? 3 4 Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 19 hours ago, EZ-E said: If you also read the tea leaves with scholarship numbers, Betts being allowed to sign scream that Mo is not expected to be on scholarship next semester There are two open spots for this class still, and that is with Betts and Washington. Those leaves you have might not be tea Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, Thanks_Tom RR said: There are two open spots for this class still, and that is with Betts and Washington. Those leaves you have might not be tea You can only have 88 at a time on scholarship at the end of each semester. Which is why Betts and Conn weren't going to be allowed to sign early because we thought we had either Slusher or Johnson. When it was clear we didn't we let Conn sign late Wednesday. After Frost's meeting with Mo, Betts was allowed to sign placing us at 88; 3 over the total limit, perfectly legal. 2 Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 26 has been the number all along. They signed 24. Quote Link to comment
dubsker Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 35 minutes ago, EZ-E said: You can only have 88 at a time on scholarship at the end of each semester. Which is why Betts and Conn weren't going to be allowed to sign early because we thought we had either Slusher or Johnson. When it was clear we didn't we let Conn sign late Wednesday. After Frost's meeting with Mo, Betts was allowed to sign placing us at 88; 3 over the total limit, perfectly legal. Which is great and if I understand correctly, not a position we are accustomed to being in. Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, dubsker said: Which is great and if I understand correctly, not a position we are accustomed to being in. I expect us to sign two more in February, placing us at 90 and we'll have some attrition that gets us to 85 by the end of spring. Quote Link to comment
dubsker Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 Just now, EZ-E said: I expect us to sign two more in February, placing us at 90 and we'll have some attrition that gets us to 85 by the end of spring. That would be functioning like a top program should, in my opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted December 24, 2019 Share Posted December 24, 2019 2 hours ago, EZ-E said: You can only have 88 at a time on scholarship at the end of each semester. Which is why Betts and Conn weren't going to be allowed to sign early because we thought we had either Slusher or Johnson. When it was clear we didn't we let Conn sign late Wednesday. After Frost's meeting with Mo, Betts was allowed to sign placing us at 88; 3 over the total limit, perfectly legal. Those guys aren't early so that doesn't really apply there. 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.