RedDenver Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Nay - she should go non-retractable glass dome. Actually, to really help with flooding, she should go beyond the dome and build the entire sphere. 1 Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Yes, of course she should. I mean why would anyone not want to build a retractable dome to prevent flooding? It pretty much answers itself. The real question is if she should get sharks with lasers mounted on their frikken heads, after the dome is built. Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Does you mom have a roof on her house? Cause if she doesn't a dome would work, but it'll be cheaper to just put a roof on her house. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Did your Mom win the lottery? | | Yes No | | Build it Probs not... Quote Link to comment
Ulty Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 I have a feeling that if we all vote for her not to build the dome, she is going to declare a household emergency anyway and divert funds from the grocery budget toward building it. All of the neighbors who do not want her to build the dome must support open flooding. Floods are known to carry mud, insects, and fish (although some, I assume, are good fish), so the only solution is a big beautiful dome. Even if you don't call it a dome, it can be a cupola, a yurt, I don't care what you call it, we just need to take flood security seriously around here. In fact, we've already started to build the dome! FINISH THAT DOME! 1 Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 What problem CAN'T be solved by building a dome? Quote Link to comment
Scarlet Overkill Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Of course she should. Duh. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.