Red Five Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 4 hours ago, Moiraine said: It would suck a$$ to take one of those hits As a recipient of a blind side block in HS (off an interception, I was chasing the DB with the ball), I can confirm that is does indeed suck a$$ to take one of those. I remember trying to pop back up right after it to prove it didn't hurt, but I took a step or two and just fell back down. It took me a good 5-10 minutes to get my bearings back after it. With that said, the block is a part of football, but a very dangerous part. I am in favor of finding ways to make the game safer, so trying to limit hits like that is a good goal. But I am not sure of the best way to go about eliminating it from the game. Quote Link to comment
ScawFraw Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 So basically the Kenny Bell block in the B1G championship game against Wisconsin? Quote Link to comment
WyoHusker56 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Red Five said: As a recipient of a blind side block in HS (off an interception, I was chasing the DB with the ball), I can confirm that is does indeed suck a$$ to take one of those. I remember trying to pop back up right after it to prove it didn't hurt, but I took a step or two and just fell back down. It took me a good 5-10 minutes to get my bearings back after it. With that said, the block is a part of football, but a very dangerous part. I am in favor of finding ways to make the game safer, so trying to limit hits like that is a good goal. But I am not sure of the best way to go about eliminating it from the game. Ya I got knocked out on a play like this in high school. Still not in favor of this rule as it's being implemented. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 God this is messy. When I read the OP I was ready to defend the rule, as it's possible to block a player who doesn't see you without completely obliterating them. But then when I read the rule, I thought that the wording is way too vague and open to subjectivity and really unfair to defenders. But then I thought about how I know from personal interactions with D1 referees that the way the rules are written and the way they're taught to enforce the rules are not the same thing, and there are such a thing as unwritten rules. So I don't really know what to think. Other than where does this lead, and will it be enforced in a way that is actually fair. I doubt it. 1 Quote Link to comment
MichiganDad3 Posted August 26, 2019 Author Share Posted August 26, 2019 Maybe colorado will be a good game to test the limits of this new rule. I am thinking of a punk that likes to twist ankles. Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted August 26, 2019 Share Posted August 26, 2019 On 8/23/2019 at 12:54 PM, MichiganDad3 said: In an effort to move CFB closer to flag football, there is a new rule against blind blocks this year. You cannot hit anyone with force if they are not looking at the defender. I guess no block in the back was not good enough. Can you imagine how many bad flags this creates? I want less decision making by the refs, not more. A friend and I were discussing after reading an article about NCAA banning the 3 man wedge. They said it was among the highest instances of injury after they studied injury statistics. So if we sit down every year and make a new rule to take away the thing that is creating the most injuries football gets whittled down one thing at a time until there is no real contact left. 1 Quote Link to comment
307husker Posted August 26, 2019 Share Posted August 26, 2019 Can we just have our defensive linemen line up backwards, back their way through the line before spinning around untouched in the backfield??? It's a thought... 2 Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 On 8/26/2019 at 1:43 PM, 307husker said: Can we just have our defensive linemen line up backwards, back their way through the line before spinning around untouched in the backfield??? It's a thought... I remember reading that back in the 20s or 30s when teams ran the full house backfield one college team had the center face the backfield so he could hike the ball accurately to any of the backs. And NO I DIDN'T SEE IT MYSELF! Quote Link to comment
Danimal Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 On 8/23/2019 at 5:06 PM, JJ Husker said: I agree. On that particular play, he could've done something other than launch the way he did. But generally, in similar situations, it can be a trade off between delivering the hit or receiving it. From experience, it is always better to be the hitter instead of the hittee. There's a lot of pure physics happening out there and when people back off, lots of times the result won't be as pleasant. Yes, you can expect a blocker to not explode into the blockee and decleat the guy but you can't expect him to just set a screen and take the hit himself. Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 They called one last night. Watch for #83 coming up from the bottom of the screen Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, GSG said: They called one last night. Watch for #83 coming up from the bottom of the screen In what way did that help with player safety? He wasn’t close to going full speed at that point because he had just changed direction. I understand wanting to prevent Kenny Bell blocks, even though they’re fun to watch, but damn, this one doesn’t make the players safer. The guy even bounced back up immediately and started running. And it was a block on one of the 2 guys who had the best chance to tackle the ball carrier. Quote Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 On 8/23/2019 at 2:28 PM, brophog said: It’s a problematic rule, imo. It comes down to what the official deems forcible contact, and that’s a very difficult call on the field of play. You can get in the way, you can even initiate contact, but you can’t blow the guy up. You can still blow a guy up but he as far as the ref is concerned the blocker just needs to be in said blockee's 'field of vision'. Regardless it's going to create some dicey calls. Quote Link to comment
RedSavage Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 16 minutes ago, GSG said: They called one last night. Watch for #83 coming up from the bottom of the screen Weak Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 They called one in the MN/SDSU game as well, it was pretty similar. So I'm definitely more concerned, these guys are not "outside the field of view," the defenders are just looking past them to the ball carrier. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 24 minutes ago, GSG said: They called one last night. Watch for #83 coming up from the bottom of the screen Wow...they could call that on about every play. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.