Husker in WI Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Just now, RedSavage said: Dewitt There were definitely a few where we didn't set the edge, but more where the ILBs/Ss ran right by their gaps. Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Mighty Minnesota had all day to do whatever they wanted in their backfield. Why? Because of genius Chinander. Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Just now, Hayseed said: I edited with a comment. He’s playing scared and not matching what they’re giving us. I don't know if I buy that. We pretty much loaded the box once we were getting gashed, what part of our scheme would you call "playing scared?" Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Beginning of the season we were stunting, sending safeties and corners, delay blitzing lbs... add to that he’s watching our three heavyweights getting outmanned and content to wait for them to get five yards past the line. Our pressure was forcing bad passes and getting us picks as well. Lets play on their territory again. I think he’s playing it safe worried about them getting the big play, but they have so much room they’re doing it anyway. Edit: The DBs Have also turned overly cautious with potential interceptions bouncing off the back of their head. I think their fear of not measuring up to the receiver’s talent has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Playing not to lose. 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Stunting is not at all a good idea against zone runs, and secondary blitzes against RPOs are high risk as well. I think he played it as aggressively as he could given the offensive scheme. I am far from sold on Chinander, but I didn't see anything that made me think he got outsmarted. In the end the defensive performance is on him, but from what I can tell this isn't as much on him as it could be. Quote Link to comment
SFW Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 We are allowing 33.3 points per game to B10 opposition this season. Would be worse if not for NW. Our Defense is not improving, in fact it’s getting worse. One thing Chinander is good at.....is....giving up points. NU and Frost, need to open up the wallet and hire Wisconsin’s DC at any price. 1 Quote Link to comment
BigPeterJ Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 This fire Chinander stuff is bulls#!t. The defense had a bad game, but more often than not has carried our team. How can the same people wanting Chinander gone, not want our Offensive Coordinator gone? Or our O line coach? Or our receivers coach? Our offense is what has been pathetic, not our defense. 3 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 51 minutes ago, SFW said: NU and Frost, need to open up the wallet and hire Wisconsin’s DC at any price. You mean the guy who: 1) is a Wisconsin alumni 2) inherited a consistently top 5 defense with the rest of the staff remaining in place 3) is in his 3rd year as a DC Leonhard has done well, but he got dropped in an incredible situation and wouldn't leave Wisconsin unless it's for a head coaching job. Quote Link to comment
CalhounHusker Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 12 hours ago, Husker in WI said: There were definitely a few where we didn't set the edge, but more where the ILBs/Ss ran right by their gaps. I don’t know how noticeable it was on tv, but I can’t tell you how many times Jackson/Bootle would play themselves out of the run because of the lack of awareness. They would stay locked up with a receiver and wouldn’t even see that it was a run play. 1 Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 11 hours ago, Hayseed said: Beginning of the season we were stunting, sending safeties and corners, delay blitzing lbs... add to that he’s watching our three heavyweights getting outmanned and content to wait for them to get five yards past the line. Our pressure was forcing bad passes and getting us picks as well. Lets play on their territory again. I think he’s playing it safe worried about them getting the big play, but they have so much room they’re doing it anyway. Edit: The DBs Have also turned overly cautious with potential interceptions bouncing off the back of their head. I think their fear of not measuring up to the receiver’s talent has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Playing not to lose. I didn't get to watch the game but how do you know we didn't send DB blitzes? I saw 2 against NW last week so its not like he has completelty stopped calling them. Also our front 3 aren't really getting outmanned as you can see by the pictures posted. People hate the 3 man front then want Wisconsins D coordinator. He runs a 3 man front! Lol 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 1 minute ago, CalhounHusker said: I don’t know how noticeable it was on tv, but I can’t tell you how many times Jackson/Bootle would play themselves out of the run because of the lack of awareness. They would stay locked up with a receiver and wouldn’t even see that it was a run play. That would be man coverage. Ideally at some point they recognize it's a run, but with an RPO/play action heavy team they have to be a little cautious. In most defenses they are only cleanup guys anyway, if they need to be the ones to make a tackle someone else is doing a bad job. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 PJ Fleck said in the post game that they felt if they could get our DL moving sideways, then our LBs wouldn't fit their gaps right. Boy did that turn out to be right, and lack of instincts in our LBs is the glaring weakness of our D 3 Quote Link to comment
TheSker Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, Husker in WI said: That would be man coverage. Ideally at some point they recognize it's a run, but with an RPO/play action heavy team they have to be a little cautious. In most defenses they are only cleanup guys anyway, if they need to be the ones to make a tackle someone else is doing a bad job. Absolutely true. The scheme is in place for our LBs to be tackling machines. 1 Quote Link to comment
CalhounHusker Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Husker in WI said: That would be man coverage. Ideally at some point they recognize it's a run, but with an RPO/play action heavy team they have to be a little cautious. In most defenses they are only cleanup guys anyway, if they need to be the ones to make a tackle someone else is doing a bad job. I understand what man coverage is, but when they throw a total of 13 passes, and finish the game with 322 yards, it’s time to play the run. 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.