ActualCornHusker Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Caveman said: 1. One game was against Ohio State 2. One game was without starting QB and we lost our biggest playmaker 3. No excuse for the NW game We won #3 tho Quote Link to comment
SFW Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 It’s a gimmick offense!!!!!!! Its not a MANS offense. 4 and 2 and you run a screen pass. Frost wants to self scout...scout your manliness. Husker power!!!! 2 1 Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 8 hours ago, Caveman said: 1. One game was against Ohio State 2. One game was without starting QB and we lost our biggest playmaker 3. No excuse for the NW game Last year, we scored 115 points over the same stretch of teams, including 31 versus tOSU and 53(!) versus Minnesota. 1 Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 8 hours ago, Nebfanatic said: Nope Ha...no kidding! I knew that no matter how bad it was with Vedral that there would be posters that thought he did a great job. 1 Quote Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 10 hours ago, Nebfanatic said: Nope Disagree. None of this game was on Vedral. A healthy AMart last night and we would have had a similar result. If anything this game shows QB play hasn't been a major problem of this offense. It's never been more obvious how bad our O-line is. That, along with pedestrian receivers and undersized running backs would make any QB in the world look bad. Quote Link to comment
Stumpy1 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Our receivers were getting open, its just Vedral was getting happy feet and was looking for the quick play. I counted at least 5 times JD and Noa were both wide open and the QB chose to pull the ball and run or dumped it down to the TE or RB. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
SFW Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 B10 coaches have figured out this Gimmick offense. We can’t out man anyone in this league. Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, SFW said: B10 coaches have figured out this Gimmick offense. We can’t out man anyone in this league. Developing players and S&C can fix that Quote Link to comment
dtbugeater Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Improvements take a long time at every school. If it was easy to fix this stuff every team would be 12-0. Quote Link to comment
CalhounHusker Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 29 minutes ago, Stumpy1 said: Our receivers were getting open, its just Vedral was getting happy feet and was looking for the quick play. I counted at least 5 times JD and Noa were both wide open and the QB chose to pull the ball and run or dumped it down to the TE or RB. Including the play Wandle got hurt on Quote Link to comment
SFW Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, hskrfan4life said: Developing players and S&C can fix that Agreed, but that doesn’t fix calling a screen pass on 4 & 2 and a sideways passing offense. Quote Link to comment
runningblind Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, SFW said: Agreed, but that doesn’t fix calling a screen pass on 4 & 2 and a sideways passing offense. You can't call anything downfield when snaps are erratic and some rushers barely get tapped before they are on the QB. Quick throws are all you can call. Run on 4th & 2 you say? See above. Seems to be a common thread here..... Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Decoy73 said: Disagree. None of this game was on Vedral. A healthy AMart last night and we would have had a similar result. If anything this game shows QB play hasn't been a major problem of this offense. It's never been more obvious how bad our O-line is. That, along with pedestrian receivers and undersized running backs would make any QB in the world look bad. I'm not saying any of it was on Vedral, but he did not play as good or better than Martinez has all season, that is just flat out false. You make my point for me, it's not A marts fault he hasn't looked great this season but to say Vedral looked better last night than Martinez all season just isn't true. 1 Quote Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Nebfanatic said: I'm not saying any of it was on Vedral, but he did not play as good or better than Martinez has all season, that is just flat out false. You make my point for me, it's not A marts fault he hasn't looked great this season but to say Vedral looked better last night than Martinez all season just isn't true. I was going more of the “as good as” rather than “better “ than AMart. But, generally I agree that AMart when healthy is the starter for good reason. I think the OP’s point was that, while he didn’t do anything spectacular, Vedral took care of the ball, ran well and passed with decent accuracy last night. AMart has been inconsistent with all those things this season. Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 3 hours ago, Decoy73 said: Disagree. None of this game was on Vedral. A healthy AMart last night and we would have had a similar result. If anything this game shows QB play hasn't been a major problem of this offense. It's never been more obvious how bad our O-line is. That, along with pedestrian receivers and undersized running backs would make any QB in the world look bad. 8 defenders in the box. No one is scared of our ol. Stop the run and we have no time to set up a longer pass play. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.