Jump to content


Attrition apparently already starting.


Cdog923

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Dude said:

 

This just isn't a sustainable way to run a program.  Eventually coach is going to have to inspire guys to buy in otherwise we'll never build any depth.

 

Frost has already ran off tons of guys, and here we are a year and a half in blaming most everything on a lack of talent and depth.

 

Lack of talent and depth get built over time.  Always hate to loose guys that look good on paper, however if we add 5 or 6 every year then loosing 1 here and there isn't the end of the world.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

1 hour ago, The Dude said:

 

This just isn't a sustainable way to run a program.  Eventually coach is going to have to inspire guys to buy in otherwise we'll never build any depth.

 

Frost has already ran off tons of guys, and here we are a year-and-a-half in, blaming most everything on a lack of talent and depth.

I often wonder if the buy in isn't necessarily culture. but scheme/philosophy.  Maybe some of the guys don't see the scheme (either side?) making improvements.  I will concede that we have gone from 100% no accountability and a completely different scheme (another year of square peg round hole), but it's getting old.  Year 2 game 7 and you are complaining about the basics? That would pi$$ me off as a player. Same with not saying "I (we) were out coached".  "We need to get the guys in a better position to win".  "Get the right plays called" etc.....That's just me. Sometimes you have to point the thumb. 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, GBRFAN said:

 

Lack of talent and depth get built over time.  Always hate to loose guys that look good on paper, however if we add 5 or 6 every year then loosing 1 here and there isn't the end of the world.

Well said.  Gotta build depth but some will come and go and that's healthy.  

 

Link to comment

14 minutes ago, lo country said:

I often wonder if the buy in isn't necessarily culture. but scheme/philosophy.  Maybe some of the guys don't see the scheme (either side?) making improvements.  I will concede that we have gone from 100% no accountability and a completely different scheme (another year of square peg round hole), but it's getting old.  Year 2 game 7 and you are complaining about the basics? That would pi$$ me off as a player. Same with not saying "I (we) were out coached".  "We need to get the guys in a better position to win".  "Get the right plays called" etc.....That's just me. Sometimes you have to point the thumb. 

Scott Frost has more conference championships in two years of being a head coach (and more undefeated seasons) than Mike Riley has in a CAREER.

 

And you're questioning what "scheme" works for the players?  Seriously....

  • Plus1 2
  • Haha 1
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, TheSker said:

Scott Frost has more conference championships in two years of being a head coach (and more undefeated seasons) than Mike Riley has in a CAREER.

 

And you're questioning what "scheme" works for the players?  Seriously....

Yep.  A scheme predicated on chunk plays wont work in the B1G. We've had 17 in 3 games....3 TD's (one each of our last 3 games).....So yea, IMHO, our scheme needs work. 

 

Go back and read my posts the years under Riley.  I hated the hire when it was announced and it only grew through the 3 years he was here....Thinking I was EVER a Riley fan is insane.  

 

And yea, I'm a player and we keep running Mo off tackle, continue the screen pass, have and offense that ranks.  Our O is in the tank.  And if it was better last year, guess what.  The stars of the O were 4 Riley guys led by a Frost guy....

 

Here is our O compared to last year.  So yea, as a player I'm wondering WTF....and looking at the staff to introduce plays on the O to help me from getting my a$$ kicked.  Misdirection, shuffle pass, counters, traps, draws, quick slants, motion from different sets....

 

I'm not going to blindly follow Frost and give him a pass because he's Frost.  He owns some of this sh!t show.

 

Since David owns this site now, here is how we rank against Indiana.....

https://www.huskermax.com/2019-nebraska-indiana-football-stats-matchup/

 
NEBRASKA

4-3 (2-2)

INDIANA

5-2 (2-2)

Avg. Rank   Avg. Rank
Turnover margin -0.43 93   -0.43 93
Total offense 399.0 74   449.9 31
Total defense 392.9 64   297.0 18
Time of possession 27:36 113   33:41 10
Third-down defense 0.389 77   0.298 10
Third-down conversion 0.404 57   0.473 18
Tackles for loss 7.1 30   6.9 35
Scoring offense 25.6 88   33.4 40
Scoring defense 27.6 69   20.9 32
Sacks allowed 2.71 102   1.29 20
Sacks 2.29 59   2.57 37
Rushing offense 189.9 40   142.6 90
Rushing defense 187.7 95   128.3 39
Red zone offense 0.680 123   0.839 62
Red zone defense 0.857 90   0.923 121
Punt returns 8.92 49   5.00 99
Pass eff. defense 121.45 41   117.02 31
Passing offense 209.1 87   307.3 16
Pass efficiency 131.93 74   155.22 25
Pass defense 205.1 45   168.7 9
Net punting 40.21 33   38.31 67
Kickoff returns 20.55 71   18.92 95
Fourth-down defense 0.400 35   0.500 64
Fourth-down conversion 0.417 94   0.250 126
First downs offense 131 100   170 22
First downs defense 144 71   120 24
Fewest penalty yards 54.00 57   64.71 100
Fewest penalties 6.43 68   6.86 86

A look at the numbers through Week 7

Here’s a look at Nebraska offensively and defensively in general statistical terms compared to the 2018 season.

Total offense (2019 national rank, rank change from 2018)

399 (77, down 52 spots)

Yards per play

5.65 (80, down 60 spots)

Points per game

25.6 (90, down 32 spots)

Rushing offense

4.3 per carry (74, down 58 spots)

Total defense

392.3 (67, up 27 spots)

Yards per play allowed

5.39 (59, up 16 spots)

Points per game allowed

27.6 (72, up 16 spots)

Rushing defense

4.47 yards allowed per carry (T-83, up 24 spots)

 

 

  • Plus1 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, lo country said:

Yep.  A scheme predicated on chunk plays wont work in the B1G. We've had 17 in 3 games....3 TD's (one each of our last 3 games).....So yea, IMHO, our scheme needs work. 

Lets get you in the football offices so you can direct coach Frost on where he needs to go with his scheme.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, lo country said:

Yep.  A scheme predicated on chunk plays wont work in the B1G. We've had 17 in 3 games....3 TD's (one each of our last 3 games).....So yea, IMHO, our scheme needs work. 

 

Go back and read my posts the years under Riley.  I hated the hire when it was announced and it only grew through the 3 years he was here....Thinking I was EVER a Riley fan is insane.  

 

And yea, I'm a player and we keep running Mo off tackle, continue the screen pass, have and offense that ranks.  Our O is in the tank.  And if it was better last year, guess what.  The stars of the O were 4 Riley guys led by a Frost guy....

 

Here is our O compared to last year.  So yea, as a player I'm wondering WTF....and looking at the staff to introduce plays on the O to help me from getting my a$$ kicked.  Misdirection, shuffle pass, counters, traps, draws, quick slants, motion from different sets....

 

I'm not going to blindly follow Frost and give him a pass because he's Frost.  He owns some of this sh!t show.

 

Since David owns this site now, here is how we rank against Indiana.....

https://www.huskermax.com/2019-nebraska-indiana-football-stats-matchup/

 
NEBRASKA

4-3 (2-2)

INDIANA

5-2 (2-2)

Avg. Rank   Avg. Rank
Turnover margin -0.43 93   -0.43 93
Total offense 399.0 74   449.9 31
Total defense 392.9 64   297.0 18
Time of possession 27:36 113   33:41 10
Third-down defense 0.389 77   0.298 10
Third-down conversion 0.404 57   0.473 18
Tackles for loss 7.1 30   6.9 35
Scoring offense 25.6 88   33.4 40
Scoring defense 27.6 69   20.9 32
Sacks allowed 2.71 102   1.29 20
Sacks 2.29 59   2.57 37
Rushing offense 189.9 40   142.6 90
Rushing defense 187.7 95   128.3 39
Red zone offense 0.680 123   0.839 62
Red zone defense 0.857 90   0.923 121
Punt returns 8.92 49   5.00 99
Pass eff. defense 121.45 41   117.02 31
Passing offense 209.1 87   307.3 16
Pass efficiency 131.93 74   155.22 25
Pass defense 205.1 45   168.7 9
Net punting 40.21 33   38.31 67
Kickoff returns 20.55 71   18.92 95
Fourth-down defense 0.400 35   0.500 64
Fourth-down conversion 0.417 94   0.250 126
First downs offense 131 100   170 22
First downs defense 144 71   120 24
Fewest penalty yards 54.00 57   64.71 100
Fewest penalties 6.43 68   6.86 86

A look at the numbers through Week 7

Here’s a look at Nebraska offensively and defensively in general statistical terms compared to the 2018 season.

Total offense (2019 national rank, rank change from 2018)

399 (77, down 52 spots)

Yards per play

5.65 (80, down 60 spots)

Points per game

25.6 (90, down 32 spots)

Rushing offense

4.3 per carry (74, down 58 spots)

Total defense

392.3 (67, up 27 spots)

Yards per play allowed

5.39 (59, up 16 spots)

Points per game allowed

27.6 (72, up 16 spots)

Rushing defense

4.47 yards allowed per carry (T-83, up 24 spots)

 

 

If you can't see a bigger picture than just the broken record of this year versus last year.......

 

And I wonder if Urban Meyer would agree with your stance on chunk plays not working in the B1G?

 

Mebets not.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

Just now, 10_point_buck said:

Rumbling on HI is saying Mo is out for an extended period of time due to his conduct detrimental to the team or he may just be gone and Frost will address at this week’s news conference.

Its been discussed elsewhere but feeling is he is off the team for good. Love me some Frost but that initial recruiting class is now looking very thin. Luckily we have supplemented with a great class behind it and another one coming.

  • Plus1 1
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Nebfanatic said:

Its been discussed elsewhere but feeling is he is off the team for good. Love me some Frost but that initial recruiting class is now looking very thin. Luckily we have supplemented with a great class behind it and another one coming.

Coaches’ first classes after taking over can have a lot of turnover and misses. The coaches are trying to fill a class quickly and don’t have the ability to develop relationships and give long evaluations.  Frost even had it more challenging with that year being the first class with the early signing period in December. Frost was forced to take chances on talent, and sometimes they don’t end up panning our. 

  • Plus1 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

Its been discussed elsewhere but feeling is he is off the team for good. Love me some Frost but that initial recruiting class is now looking very thin. Luckily we have supplemented with a great class behind it and another one coming.

That first recruiting class was while he was pulling double duty, so there's going to be several misses on it.

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

Lets get you in the football offices so you can direct coach Frost on where he needs to go with his scheme.

I’m sure I’m not the only one thinking he has to change up some things.  I’d be more than happy to send him an email if you can get me in touch with him.....and again,  I THINK FROST IS THE RIGHT HIRE.  THE RIGHT GUY FOR THE JOB, but I’m not blindly following him thinking that he is 100% correct in all that he’s done.  He’s a grown man making millions, he is culpable in what’s happening....

17 minutes ago, TheSker said:

If you can't see a bigger picture than just the broken record of this year versus last year.......

 

And I wonder if Urban Meyer would agree with your stance on chunk plays not working in the B1G?

 

Mebets not.

I should listen to @PaulCrewe.......

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

Coaches’ first classes after taking over can have a lot of turnover and misses. The coaches are trying to fill a class quickly and don’t have the ability to develop relationships and give long evaluations.  Frost even had it more challenging with that year being the first class with the early signing period in December. Frost was forced to take chances on talent, and sometimes they don’t end up panning our. 

 

5 minutes ago, TheSker said:

That first recruiting class was while he was pulling double duty, so there's going to be several misses on it.

He certainly didn't have alot of time and had much to do and he did admirably. That said, it is what it is and it will affect us to a degree. If we can keep the kids we have been bringing in on campus at a better rate I think we can mitigate that affect though as there is alot of talent.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...