Chinander Defence: 103 lost points in last 3 games

[The Dude]

Against 3 teams we walk all over on the recruiting front.  Yeesh.

 

Pretty much everyone who payed attention to Frost at UCF knew we'd be in this position now if he brought Chinander along.   Extremely frustrating because I do agree with the belief that we need some continuity in the coaching staff, but Chin was clearly never the answer.

 

Quite the sticky wicket.

[Huckleberry Muhammad]

8 hours ago, dvdcrr said:

No offence, but in the USA it is "Defense"

 

Aww... I finally met the Board Spelling (and likely Grammar) Nazi.   How cute. 

 

I'm new here, I didn't know there was one of you around.. love the misspelling of offense by you, there in your post to me.  Very klever. 

[Redux]

When Wiscy hangs 100 on us there won't be a need to watch tape.

[Redux]

1 minute ago, Huckleberry Muhammad said:

I'm new here, I didn't know there was one of you around..

 

You must be new to the internet in general 

[dvdcrr]

9 hours ago, SFW said:

 

 

 

Chinander gave up 124 points in this last 3 games at UCF!

 

And 55 of those were against a team they were playing for a second time that season whom they had previously held to 13 points.  It is always harder to slow a team down the second time.

[twofittyonred]

I said when chin came over, "the only reason that defense worked was that the offense was scoring more then the defense gave up"..  That is not the case here and its GLARING...

 

[The Maudfather]

I'm of the opinion that new coaches should be given run way. That being said, Chin's defense f#&%ing sucks. 

[teachercd]

23 minutes ago, twofittyonred said:

I said when chin came over, "the only reason that defense worked was that the offense was scoring more then the defense gave up"..  That is not the case here and its GLARING...

 

Ummm...that is sort of how you want it to work.

[Saunders]

I don't even...

[twofittyonred]

17 minutes ago, teachercd said:

Ummm...that is sort of how you want it to work.

ummmm...  but its not....   soooooo....

[Husker in WI]

Just now, twofittyonred said:

ummmm...  but its not....   soooooo....

 

You would rather the offense not score more than the defense gives up?

 

We know what you mean, but how much the defense can give up does depend on the offense. Iowa's D needs to hold teams to 10 points per game, and they can a lot of times because they only defend 50 plays when their offense is clicking.

[teachercd]

6 minutes ago, Husker in WI said:

 

You would rather the offense not score more than the defense gives up?

 

We know what you mean, but how much the defense can give up does depend on the offense. Iowa's D needs to hold teams to 10 points per game, and they can a lot of times because they only defend 50 plays when their offense is clicking.

Ha...that is what he is getting right now!  GO BIG RED!

[twofittyonred]

1 minute ago, Husker in WI said:

 

You would rather the offense not score more than the defense gives up?

 

We know what you mean, but how much the defense can give up does depend on the offense. Iowa's D needs to hold teams to 10 points per game, and they can a lot of times because they only defend 50 plays when their offense is clicking.

Chins defense was ridiculed even as UCF won. We dont have that offense and until we do, we wont win with this defense. 

[3rd and long]

1 hour ago, dvdcrr said:

And 55 of those were against a team they were playing for a second time that season whom they had previously held to 13 points.  It is always harder to slow a team down the second time.

Especially when you never do anything different.  

[SFW]

1 hour ago, dvdcrr said:

And 55 of those were against a team they were playing for a second time that season whom they had previously held to 13 points.  It is always harder to slow a team down the second time.

And look at what’s happening the second time around the Big 10.  3rd times a charm I guess!