Jason Sitoke Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Redux said: If you'd bother to read, I added the caveat "in some instances". Again, as an example the effectiveness drops from 93% to 88%. And that's just in the short term data. But if we look at the supposed surgin new cases, do you think that 88% effectiveness number is going to hold up? I reread it several times, as it was confusing. I couldn’t care less about the political whataboutisms that dominate the thread. But spewing garbage deserves at least a gif in response. You’re welcome. . 1 Link to comment
Redux Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 12 minutes ago, Jason Sitoke said: I reread it several times, as it was confusing. I couldn’t care less about the political whataboutisms that dominate the thread. But spewing garbage deserves at least a gif in response. You’re welcome. . I'm sorry it was difficult to understand honesty 1 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Redux said: Here, I updated it for a few of you. Hope this helps. What a load of bulls#!t. But carry on. 1 1 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 9 hours ago, Redux said: I find it funny that people try to solely blame the Republicans for hesitancy to get a vaccine that was developed in record time, isn't FDA approved, cause side effects that mimic the virus it protects against in some instances, doesn't actually prevent contracting or spreading covid in some instances, is useless against the mutation variant and is being politicized left and right. Yeah, can't imagine why people are hesitant.... That said, I'll probably get the Moderna version Read the bolded again. You clearly stated it was useless against the mutation variant which is false. Your caveat, as you wrote it, pertains to your claim that it doesn't prevent contracting or spreading covid. 1 hour ago, Redux said: I'm sorry it was difficult to understand honesty No, the reaction you received wasn't from anyone misunderstanding honesty. It was understanding exactly what you wrote and now that you've been corrected you're backpedaling. I'll give you credit for that at least. 1 Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 40 minutes ago, Scarlet said: Take a look at Nebraska. Not surprisingly, the hot spots in Colorado align with Lauren Boebert’s congressional district mapping. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cdc-mask-decision-stunning-findings-cape-cod-beach/story?id=79148102 1 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Scarlet said: Take a look at Nebraska. NE is pretty dark. But with Mizzura and Iwegians flashing hot it will only be so long... 1 Link to comment
admo Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 2 hours ago, Scarlet said: Take a look at Nebraska. Nebraska will go red, the minute there is a sale at Kohl's. 1 Link to comment
admo Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 6 hours ago, DevoHusker said: Locally, this Saturday, JBS is giving 10lbs of beef for every shot at a joint clinic with the Health Department That's awesome. Maybe they will include "free extra masks with every shot you get"?? Dems: "Do your part, get vaccinated, for America!....and wear your mask too...For that super extra protection relief"....."because it's sorta like Tylenol extra strength, but with science and stuff" 2 1 Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 1 hour ago, DevoHusker said: NE is pretty dark. But with Mizzura and Iwegians flashing hot it will only be so long... Saw on Twitter that Nebraska stopped reporting COVID cases at the end of June. Thus, Nebraska’s dark shading. 3 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 1 minute ago, ColoradoHusk said: Saw on Twitter that Nebraska stopped reporting COVID cases at the end of June. Thus, Nebraska’s dark shading. I saw that too 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 I don’t even know if Johansson is right in suing Disney and I don’t really care if she is. This is such a f#&%ing piece of s#!t response: Quote Disney (DIS) responded on Thursday saying that "there is no merit whatsoever to this filing" and that the suit is "especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic." Link to comment
Redux Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 11 hours ago, Scarlet said: What a load of bulls#!t. But carry on. I know, honesty can look untrustworthy when you're used to propaganda 1 1 Link to comment
Redux Posted July 30, 2021 Share Posted July 30, 2021 11 hours ago, Scarlet said: Read the bolded again. You clearly stated it was useless against the mutation variant which is false. Your caveat, as you wrote it, pertains to your claim that it doesn't prevent contracting or spreading covid. No, the reaction you received wasn't from anyone misunderstanding honesty. It was understanding exactly what you wrote and now that you've been corrected you're backpedaling. I'll give you credit for that at least. I omitted a few words and amended it. You doube and triple downing on my honest omission is low hanging fruit because you've got nothing else. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts