Censorship

[funhusker]

5 hours ago, funhusker said:

Where does it say CBS left Twitter?

Still can't find where CBS said they were leaving Twitter.

 

Any help would be appreciated @nic

 

Maybe the person that laughed can fill us in?

[knapplc]

19 minutes ago, funhusker said:

Still can't find where CBS said they were leaving Twitter.

 

Any help would be appreciated @nic

 

Maybe the person that laughed can fill us in?

 

 

[funhusker]

47 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

 

I guess I don't see "pausing activity" (which it looks like they did for a chunk of Friday night and Saturday) as the same as "leaving".

[commando]

banning books.     this might also fit in the racism thread.  good job south carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BigRedBuster]

11 minutes ago, commando said:

banning books.     this might also fit in the racism thread.  good job south carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some people are f#&%ing idiots.

[Scarlet]

1 hour ago, commando said:

banning books.     this might also fit in the racism thread.  good job south carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mom's for Liberty huh?  Nothing says liberty like a good book banning 

[Archy1221]

7 hours ago, knapplc said:

More very smart decisions by very smart man.

 

 

 

 

I’ll take “things that never happened but are posted anonymously” for $1000 Alex. 

[commando]

you maniacs.....lol

 

[knapplc]

I had no idea the Babylon Bee was supposedly "Christian." That explains SO MUCH of why they post what they post.

 

 

 

[Archy1221]

^^^^^^^^^^^

[funhusker]

5 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

^^^^^^^^^^^

If "conservative" = "ignorant a$$h@!es", then yes James.  You are correct.

[Enhance]

3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

^^^^^^^^^^^

Not sure Elon would agree with James' interpretation here.

 

Sounds like suppression could very much be a 'thing' depending on how negative/hateful one's tweets are, no?

[funhusker]

2 minutes ago, funhusker said:

If "conservative" = "ignorant a$$h@!es", then yes James.  You are correct.

I'd like to ask folks like @Archy1221, why do you want hateful people who associate themselves with the GOP to have a large audience?  

 

I really think the GOP would be better off if they were to actually reject these racists and bigots, not defend them. Banning from Twitter is not a violation of the 1st Amendment, it's free enterprise: something the GOP used to champion.  There are actual "deplorable" folks in this world, and they shouldn't be given attention.

[knapplc]

Orange Man Bad was banned from twitter for inciting a riot that resulted in dozens of criminal convictions and a few deaths.

 

And James Woods is celebrating the return of that man as a free speech issue. 

 

That is totally on brand for today's MAGA conservatives. Just diseased in the brain.

[Archy1221]

10 minutes ago, Enhance said:

 

Sounds like suppression could very much be a 'thing' depending on how negative/hateful one's tweets are, no?

My guess is James is speaking in regards to the accounts like the Babylon Bee that got suspended for no good reason.   The second to last sentence is quite important too.  

13 minutes ago, funhusker said:

If "conservative" = "ignorant a$$h@!es", then yes James.  You are correct.

Wait, I thought you weren’t on Twitter?