Ratt Mhule Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 8 hours ago, Moiraine said: What about this upsets you? Hes watering it down when there is no need. Dems have all branches of govt. Why appease republicans? Republican voters need the money also. He went from $2k to $1400 now to well everyone who got the last one might not get this one. Whats next? My guess is they try to pass it through in a bipatisan way instead of through reconciliation and then throw there hands up and say well we tries there is nothing we can do. 1 1 Link to comment
Redux Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 Meanwhile transgender studies in foreign countries and the drinking fountains of the art center get funding 2 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 4 hours ago, Frott Scost said: Hes watering it down when there is no need. Dems have all branches of govt. Why appease republicans? Republican voters need the money also. He went from $2k to $1400 now to well everyone who got the last one might not get this one. Whats next? My guess is they try to pass it through in a bipatisan way instead of through reconciliation and then throw there hands up and say well we tries there is nothing we can do. It's actually more that they need to appease Manchin. If it was up to me the checks would be for more $ but lower the income cut off to $30,000. But I don't see it as a big deal if they decide to lower the income cutoff to $60,000 and keep it at $1,400. Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 'Thanks Trump' couldn't be more fitting. 1 Link to comment
mrandyk Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 On 1/26/2021 at 11:19 AM, Redux said: Meanwhile transgender studies in foreign countries and the drinking fountains of the art center get funding That's the bill that Trump signed, right? Find any reason to be mad at Biden though. 2 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 5 hours ago, suh_fan93 said: 'Thanks Trump' couldn't be more fitting. This is pretty sad. I'm glad I got to see the capitol once before this mess goes up. 1 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted January 29, 2021 Author Share Posted January 29, 2021 6 minutes ago, ZRod said: This is pretty sad. I'm glad I got to see the capitol once before this mess goes up. One really sad enduring hallmark of Trumpism is the way(s) the rest of us have had to alter our lives because a bunch of entitled, psycho a$$h@!es think the rules don't apply to them and they can do whatever they want without consequences. 2 1 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 On 1/25/2021 at 5:26 PM, Archy1221 said: And eliminating union jobs, You're going to ride that fake pony all the way...aren't you? 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 39 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: You're going to ride that fake pony all the way...aren't you? True isn’t fake. Keystone Pipeline XL is/was union labor correct? 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Archy1221 said: True isn’t fake. Keystone Pipeline XL is/was union labor correct? It wasn't when my wife's uncle worked on other pipelines. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 4 hours ago, Archy1221 said: True isn’t fake. Keystone Pipeline XL is/was union labor correct? Sure...but the number of jobs and the longevity of them don't deserve the outrage when you look at the negatives of the project. It's really a pretty pathetic political hack talking point. The outrage is what's fake. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: Sure...but the number of jobs and the longevity of them don't deserve the outrage when you look at the negatives of the project. It's really a pretty pathetic political hack talking point. The outrage is what's fake. What are the negatives of the project? The Obama State Department found no environmental impact from I believe 4 or 5 different studies. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: What are the negatives of the project? The Obama State Department found no environmental impact from I believe 4 or 5 different studies. We’ve had this conversation before. Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 5:32 PM, RedDenver said: Democrats=republican lite 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts