TheSker Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 39 minutes ago, HANC said: Oh, I absolutely see progress, just wanted to point out that no matter how good or bad Wiscy is, they are guaranteed to put up unreal rushing numbers against us. Is that the same "guarantee" that we put up 62 points every time we play Florida? Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 3 hours ago, Mavric said: Are we gathering the pessimism into one place? Quote Link to comment
HANC Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 1 hour ago, TheSker said: Is that the same "guarantee" that we put up 62 points every time we play Florida? I wish, but that happened once, whereas Wiscy has run us ragged basically everytime out. Not sure your correlation 1 Quote Link to comment
runningblind Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 1 hour ago, TheSker said: Is that the same "guarantee" that we put up 62 points every time we play Florida? Yep, same exact thing as against a school we've played twice in 50 years. What are you even talking about? Here are the Wisconsin rushing stats against Nebraska since we joined the Big Ten: Carries/Yards (YPC) 2011: 50/231 (4.62) 2012: 41/56 (1.36) 2012 (2): 50/539 (10.78) 2014: 53/581 (10.96) 2015: 34/147 (4.32) 2016: 38/223 (5.86) 2017: 49/353 (7.20) 2018: 48/370 (7.70) 2019: 45/320 (7.10) Total: 408/2820 (6.91) 313 per game average over 9 B1G games, and almost 7 ypc over a decade. That's pretty much guaranteed. There was an NCAA record given up in there also (check out the number of total number of carries for a reminder). 2 Quote Link to comment
HANC Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, runningblind said: Yep, same exact thing as against a school we've played twice in 50 years. What are you even talking about? Here are the Wisconsin rushing stats against Nebraska since we joined the Big Ten: Carries/Yards (YPC) 2011: 50/231 (4.62) 2012: 41/56 (1.36) 2012 (2): 50/539 (10.78) 2014: 53/581 (10.96) 2015: 34/147 (4.32) 2016: 38/223 (5.86) 2017: 49/353 (7.20) 2018: 48/370 (7.70) 2019: 45/320 (7.10) Total: 408/2820 (6.91) 313 per game average over 9 B1G games, and almost 7 ypc over a decade. That's pretty much guaranteed. There was an NCAA record given up in there also (check out the number of total number of carries for a reminder). Thank you for doing my footwork. Prob just being antagonistic over nothing. 1 Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 21 minutes ago, runningblind said: Yep, same exact thing as against a school we've played twice in 50 years. What are you even talking about? Here are the Wisconsin rushing stats against Nebraska since we joined the Big Ten: Carries/Yards (YPC) 2011: 50/231 (4.62) 2012: 41/56 (1.36) 2012 (2): 50/539 (10.78) 2014: 53/581 (10.96) 2015: 34/147 (4.32) 2016: 38/223 (5.86) 2017: 49/353 (7.20) 2018: 48/370 (7.70) 2019: 45/320 (7.10) Total: 408/2820 (6.91) 313 per game average over 9 B1G games, and almost 7 ypc over a decade. That's pretty much guaranteed. There was an NCAA record given up in there also (check out the number of total number of carries for a reminder). Imagine that Husker Power with Oregon speed! I knew it was bad, but seeing it laid out like that we truly struggle with their running game. Take out the 2012 (game 1) and they were at 7.5 yards per carry. Thx for putting that together. 1 Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 1 hour ago, lo country said: Imagine that Husker Power with Oregon speed! I knew it was bad, but seeing it laid out like that we truly struggle with their running game. Take out the 2012 (game 1) and they were at 7.5 yards per carry. Thx for putting that together. And the second time around in 2012 was against the default Leaders champion due to 1/3 of the division was ineligible for postseason play. Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 1 hour ago, Savage Husker said: And the second time around in 2012 was against the default Leaders champion due to 1/3 of the division was ineligible for postseason play. I forgot about that.... Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 22 hours ago, runningblind said: Yep, same exact thing as against a school we've played twice in 50 years. What are you even talking about? Here are the Wisconsin rushing stats against Nebraska since we joined the Big Ten: Carries/Yards (YPC) 2011: 50/231 (4.62) 2012: 41/56 (1.36) 2012 (2): 50/539 (10.78) 2014: 53/581 (10.96) 2015: 34/147 (4.32) 2016: 38/223 (5.86) 2017: 49/353 (7.20) 2018: 48/370 (7.70) 2019: 45/320 (7.10) Total: 408/2820 (6.91) 313 per game average over 9 B1G games, and almost 7 ypc over a decade. That's pretty much guaranteed. There was an NCAA record given up in there also (check out the number of total number of carries for a reminder). Interesting stats. I really wish we could have played them this year. We started off the year against OSU and held them to 215 yards rushing. In that game, both our line's looked better than they did last year. I was really looking forward to see what we could do against Wisky. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: Interesting stats. I really wish we could have played them this year. We started off the year against OSU and held them to 215 yards rushing. In that game, both our line's looked better than they did last year. I was really looking forward to see what we could do against Wisky. Given our history I understand the laugh emoji but I was also curious. If there was a year to take a step forward, even just to prove to ourselves that we can slow their run game under ideal circumstances it was last year. Wisconsin's Season YPC 2018: 6.2 2019: 5.4 2020: 3.9 They had a very good running game against Michigan, good enough against Minnesota, and not good in the other games. I am worried about next year when it's less Groshek/Watson and more Berger. We missed them the year they didn't have a consistent stud back, and I expect Berger to seize that role next year. 1 Quote Link to comment
Head Coach Scott Frost Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 On 2/14/2021 at 5:33 PM, lo country said: Imagine that Husker Power with Oregon speed That quote is so dumb. Of course if you're stronger and faster than everyone else you'll be better off. Duh. 1 Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 9 hours ago, Head Coach Scott Frost said: That quote is so dumb. Of course if you're stronger and faster than everyone else you'll be better off. Duh. Lighten up Francis.......You forgot the smiley face in your quote.........And to date, stronger and faster hasn't translated into wins under Frost...... Quote Link to comment
TGHusker Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 On 2/28/2021 at 11:05 PM, Mavric said: I hope he is a big contributor this year. He has the potential to be very, very good. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.