Popular Post Sgt Red Posted March 20, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 20, 2021 https://huskers.com/sports/football/roster/2021?&sort=class The number of all red shirt or true freshmen on the team is 111. SF is changing the talent level for the better. 1 3 6 Quote Link to comment
Sgt Red Posted March 21, 2021 Author Share Posted March 21, 2021 Too much truth to handle! 4 1 Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 How many years in a row is it now? At least 4. 3 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker03 Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 5 hours ago, The Dude said: How many years in a row is it now? At least 4. We haven't had an upper classman on the roster since TO was walking the sidelines. 1 Quote Link to comment
NoLongerN Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 I can't buy into that OP title anymore. I believe it would be better titled, "We Have A Bad Direction." That is all. 2 Quote Link to comment
Ulty Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 We need to stop recruiting so many kids who are less than 21. Way too immature. 2 Quote Link to comment
funhusker Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 And yet, it is probably Frost’s most experienced team he’s had... (His first year had a lot of experience though) Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 On 3/19/2021 at 6:20 PM, Sgt Red said: https://huskers.com/sports/football/roster/2021?&sort=class The number of all red shirt or true freshmen on the team is 111. SF is changing the talent level for the better. Do you have anything to back up the bolded? Maybe, a better question would by why are we heading into year four so young? We are young and inexperienced. Why, as we enter year four? Are we still going to be using this excuse as we head into year six or seven? 3 Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 13 minutes ago, junior4949 said: Do you have anything to back up the bolded? Maybe, a better question would by why are we heading into year four so young? We are young and inexperienced. Why, as we enter year four? Are we still going to be using this excuse as we head into year six or seven? Because it takes 2 to 3 years to get rid of the old coaches recruits. We have been so bad for so long & culture has been lost. 1 2 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 We are also a bad team. 4 Quote Link to comment
commando Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 if it weren't for the covid we would be a much older team. 2 Quote Link to comment
Sgt Red Posted March 21, 2021 Author Share Posted March 21, 2021 2 hours ago, junior4949 said: Do you have anything to back up the bolded? Maybe, a better question would by why are we heading into year four so young? We are young and inexperienced. Why, as we enter year four? Are we still going to be using this excuse as we head into year six or seven? I think our recruiting rankings show we have better talent than the MR era which was inherited. We are going into the year young due to attrition. Guys who no longer wanted to live up to a higher standard on and off the field and guys who refused to stay and win a job outright. Some others just didn't have the talent and needed to go. Some may have lost faith in the system due to all the close losses. No, I do not think this is a perpetual point of argument but it is now. SF had a monumental rebuild when he came because of the failures of the past coaches and administrations. Even so, I do find fault in SF. He needs to change his offense to suit the Big 10. We must have a power running game to win. Period! I am confident that will happen. 5 1 Quote Link to comment
dubsker Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 The most surprising thing to me, was that someone took an entire day to respond to this post. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.