deedsker Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Just now, Redux said: Correcting a typo doesn't mean adding more letters Remove ACB and Gorsuch and leave 7 on the court then? 2 Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 1 minute ago, Redux said: Correcting a typo doesn't mean adding more letters There's nothing in the Constitution dictating the number of Supreme Court justices. Link to comment
Redux Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Just now, deedsker said: Remove ACB and Gorsuch and leave 7 on the court then? 1 Link to comment
Redux Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 1 minute ago, knapplc said: There's nothing in the Constitution dictating the number of Supreme Court justices. And then when a Republican gets the White House back we'll add more to make it lean their way. Eventually we will have 30 of the lifetime payroll spots, wonderful! 3 Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Just now, Redux said: And then when a Republican gets the White House back we'll add more to make it lean their way. Eventually we will have 30 of the lifetime payroll spots, wonderful! It's not that easy. Link to comment
Redux Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Just now, knapplc said: It's not that easy. True, we have to have a puppet show before we appoint them now. So that'll be fun I guess. 3 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted April 15, 2021 Author Share Posted April 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, deedsker said: Remove ACB and Gorsuch and leave 7 on the court then? I don't know about that. Kind of reminds me of this movie trailer.... What are you really saying Link to comment
deedsker Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 4 minutes ago, TGHusker said: I don't know about that. Kind of reminds me of this movie trailer.... What are you really saying Dang! I am not even original in my thoughts...a movie based on a book that has existed for almost 30 years. Lame. Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 23 minutes ago, knapplc said: If the Democrats had stolen two seats from the republicans I'd have the same opinion. You can actually only complain about one seat being “stolen”. Not two. If you are for Garland being seated than you need to be for Barrett being seated also 2 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted April 15, 2021 Author Share Posted April 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, deedsker said: Dang! I am not even original in my thoughts...a movie based on a book that has existed for almost 30 years. Lame. Oh well, they say there is nothing new under the sun. But perhaps that original thought will hit you about 2 am while you are trying to sleep. Make sure you write it down. Link to comment
deedsker Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 4 minutes ago, TGHusker said: Oh well, they say there is nothing new under the sun. But perhaps that original thought will hit you about 2 am while you are trying to sleep. Make sure you write it down. I am going to just start writing a book every day based on my dreams and make a killing. Link to comment
ScarletRevival Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 3 hours ago, knapplc said: Let's rest blame where it belongs. Merrick Garland was salvo one, Amy Coney Barrett was salvo two. Expanding the court is the only reasonable response to that. This country cannot continue to be influenced by minority rule like this. 51 minutes ago, knapplc said: If the Democrats had stolen two seats from the republicans I'd have the same opinion. 44 minutes ago, knapplc said: I don't give a damn about the Democrats. I care about what's right. McConnell orchestrated a hijacking of the Supreme Court, and that should be corrected. For what, for the President fulfilling his duty to fill Supreme Court seats? You act as if this hasn't happened numerous times throughout the history of our country. 1 hour ago, knapplc said: I'm not a fan of it either, but majority rule has to win out. That's the basis of a democracy. The United States is not a democracy, so can we quit mis-using that term? 1 1 Link to comment
ScarletRevival Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 1 hour ago, Redux said: And then when a Republican gets the White House back we'll add more to make it lean their way. Eventually we will have 30 of the lifetime payroll spots, wonderful! The Dems are trying to make sure that will never, ever happen. This is a totalitarian power play by the radicals that run that party. 1 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted April 15, 2021 Author Share Posted April 15, 2021 44 minutes ago, deedsker said: I am going to just start writing a book every day based on my dreams and make a killing. Sounds like the start of a great movie "It was a dark, dreary, rainy day when... Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 27 minutes ago, ScarletRevival said: The Dems are trying to make sure that will never, ever happen. And the Republicans are trying to make sure the Dems never get to the White House again, too. It's just that one side is trying to do it while keeping something resembling a moral compass. Link to comment
Recommended Posts