Jump to content


The trumpet alt-reality election recount extravaganza t2o electrick boogaloop-be-bop-a-ree-bop


Recommended Posts


46 minutes ago, funhusker said:

’m fully expecting this to also be false information.

So if the audit backs up the final election count, it’s false information.   If the audit finds discrepancies it’s false information?   What will constitute valid info to you?  

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

Arizona

Arizona?  You mean the same Arizona that already did a hand recount of the county in question, twice tested the accuracy of the voting machines, then hired two independent auditors to inspect the voting machines?  That Arizona?

 

Or is "Arizona" hiring this company, who's CEO btw has already mouthed off conspiracies regarding the 2020 election, to do the audit? 

 

 

Seems legit.  What could go wrong?  Especially since Trump, by saying this,  is already laying the groundwork to delegitimize anyone who might question the integrity of an "audit" that appears to not have any intention of being transparent or even necessary. 

 

"Incredible organization and integrity taking place in Arizona with respect to the Fraudulent 2020 Presidential Election," said Trump in a statement Monday afternoon. "These are Great American Patriots, but watch, the Radical Left Democrats 'demean and destroy campaign' will start very soon."

 

You're not naive.  You know how this is going to play out.  You also know this is just another attempt by Trump and his sycophants to further damage democracy in the United States.  The question is why do support this?

 

  • Plus1 5
Link to comment
11 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

So if the audit backs up the final election count, it’s false information.   If the audit finds discrepancies it’s false information?   What will constitute valid info to you?  

 

2 hours ago, Scarlet said:

Arizona?  You mean the same Arizona that already did a hand recount of the county in question, twice tested the accuracy of the voting machines, then hired two independent auditors to inspect the voting machines?  That Arizona?

 

Or is "Arizona" hiring this company, who's CEO btw has already mouthed off conspiracies regarding the 2020 election, to do the audit? 

Yeah...what possibly could go wrong here @Archy1221 ?

 

Once those ballots were taken out of security and given to this CEO in private, they immediately became invalid and might as well be burned.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

5 hours ago, Scarlet said:

Arizona?  You mean the same Arizona that already did a hand recount of the county in question, twice tested the accuracy of the voting machines, then hired two independent auditors to inspect the voting machines?  That Arizona?

 

Or is "Arizona" hiring this company, who's CEO btw has already mouthed off conspiracies regarding the 2020 election, to do the audit? 

 

 

Seems legit.  What could go wrong?  Especially since Trump, by saying this,  is already laying the groundwork to delegitimize anyone who might question the integrity of an "audit" that appears to not have any intention of being transparent or even necessary. 

 

"Incredible organization and integrity taking place in Arizona with respect to the Fraudulent 2020 Presidential Election," said Trump in a statement Monday afternoon. "These are Great American Patriots, but watch, the Radical Left Democrats 'demean and destroy campaign' will start very soon."

 

You're not naive.  You know how this is going to play out.  You also know this is just another attempt by Trump and his sycophants to further damage democracy in the United States.  The question is why do support this?

 

+10,000

 

This only perpetuates the GOP assault on America and Democracy. 

 

It amazes me that they have come to hate both just for the ability to nominate an extra judge or two. 

  • Plus1 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

+10,000

 

This only perpetuates the GOP assault on America and Democracy. 

 

It amazes me that they have come to hate both just for the ability to nominate an extra judge or two. 

That is so 2016.  Now, it's to do everything they can to remain loyal to the Dear Leader.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
15 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

So if the audit backs up the final election count, it’s false information.   If the audit finds discrepancies it’s false information?   What will constitute valid info to you?  

 

Every state has provided valid counts, often recounted for assurance, often under the eye of Republican state officials and admitted Trump voters. More than 63 challenges to election results were sent to the courts and 100% of them were rejected for having 0% actionable evidence.

 

So really the question is on you, and the disturbing number of Republicans who want to promote this myth and enact more methods for manipulating election results they don't like. What could be more valid than what we've already done? And how f#&%ing childish and pathetic are these attempts to prove otherwise? 

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment

4 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

Every state has provided valid counts, often recounted for assurance, often under the eye of Republican state officials and admitted Trump voters. More than 63 challenges to election results were sent to the courts and 100% of them were rejected for having 0% actionable evidence.

 

So really the question is on you, and the disturbing number of Republicans who want to promote this myth and enact more methods for manipulating election results they don't like. What could be more valid than what we've already done? And how f#&%ing childish and pathetic are these attempts to prove otherwise? 

1) Recounts are different than audits which I guess I assumed you knew.  
 

2) if you don’t live in Arizona why do you care?  It’s not changing an election, or state outcome.  It does give quality assurance to keep the same standard of election laws in 2022 that were in place for 2020.  You of all people should be in favor of that.  
 

3) Surprised you are against election audits.  

54 minutes ago, knapplc said:

This seems TOTALLY above-board.  :rolleyes:

 

I can't wait for people right here on this very board to breathlessly shout, "SEE!!?!?! There WAS frauddddddduh!!!" after this clown show produces its report.

 

 

Good for the judge.  It should be public 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

1) Recounts are different than audits which I guess I assumed you knew.  
 

2) if you don’t live in Arizona why do you care?  It’s not changing an election, or state outcome.  It does give quality assurance to keep the same standard of election laws in 2022 that were in place for 2020.  You of all people should be in favor of that.  
 

3) Surprised you are against election audits.  

Good for the judge.  It should be public 

 

You're adorable when you try to pretend this s#!t is debatable. 

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/ex-state-rep-anthony-kern-who-was-capitol-riot-seen-counting-ballots-arizona-audit-1588010%3famp=1

 

"Former Republican state Representative Anthony Kern, who was present at the January 6 Capitol riot and advocated the baseless "Stop the Steal" movement, has been seen taking part in the hand recount of Maricopa County's 2.1 million ballots from the 2020 election."

 

 

Lol.... 

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...