teachercd Posted November 2, 2022 Share Posted November 2, 2022 Parkland shooter doesn't get executed. Wow. Link to comment
Scarlet Posted November 19, 2022 Share Posted November 19, 2022 Quote according to Schenck, it is not the first time a decision has been leaked. Schenck had "worked for years" to gain access to the court by trading favors and using his faith, he told the Times. And in 2014, two of Schenck's "star donors," Donald and Gayle Wright, ate a meal with Justice Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann. The next day, the Times reported, one of the Wrights called Schenck and told him Alito had written the majority opinion, and that the case would be decided in favor of Hobby Lobby. Less than a month later, that exact decision was announced to the public. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/11/19/former-anti-abortion-leader-alleges-supreme-court-leaked-another-landmark-case-report-says.html Hmmm....Alito 1 1 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted November 19, 2022 Share Posted November 19, 2022 This court is dirty, dirty, dirty. 1 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted November 20, 2022 Share Posted November 20, 2022 On 11/19/2022 at 12:03 PM, Scarlet said: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/11/19/former-anti-abortion-leader-alleges-supreme-court-leaked-another-landmark-case-report-says.html Hmmm....Alito I thought only libs could leak from the supreme court? 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted November 20, 2022 Share Posted November 20, 2022 55 minutes ago, ZRod said: I thought only libs could leak from. The supreme court? Both Alito and Wright are denying the story. 1 6 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted November 21, 2022 Share Posted November 21, 2022 19 hours ago, Archy1221 said: Both Alito and Wright are denying the story. https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/completely-false-alito-denies-leaking-hobby-lobby-ruling-while-dining-with-christian-friends-weeks-before-official-2014-decision/amp/ “The evidence for Mr. Schenck’s account of the breach has gaps,” the Times admitted Any “allegation that the Wrights were told the outcome of the decision in the Hobby Lobbycase, or the authorship of the opinion of the Court, by me or my wife, is completely false,” Alito said in the statement. Gayle Wright, in an interview with the Times, said that a justice doesn’t “ever tell you about cases.” “They aren’t allowed to,” she reportedly continued. “Nor would I ask. There has never been a time in all my years that a justice or a justice’s spouse told me anything about a decision.” Hobby Lobby founder David Green declined to comment, according to the Times, and Barbara Green, his mother, said she “had no idea which way” the Supreme Court decision “was going to go” before it was announced, the Timesreported. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 wtf? this guy might be softer in the brain than sheriff walker. 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 I’ve always liked the idea of 18 year term limits for SC justices https://www.rawstory.com/columnist-lays-out-a-game-plan-for-saving-the-politicized-supreme-court-from-itself/ Rubin goes on to lay out three possible ways to bring about Supreme Court “reform”: (1) “Eliminate lifetime tenure for justices,” (2) “Expand the Court,” and (3) “Implement ethics rules for justices.” Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 Alito really is working overtime to establish himself as one of our least-intelligent and most partisan pandering Justices. 2 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 On 12/6/2022 at 9:25 AM, commando said: wtf? this guy might be softer in the brain than sheriff walker. Is that not sarcasm? People are laughing in the background. 1 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 Hmmm.... can't find the leaker eh? Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 9 minutes ago, Scarlet said: Hmmm.... can't find the leaker eh? Ya that seems hard to believe. Something must be pretty embarrassing for the court to have this finding imo. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 41 minutes ago, Scarlet said: Hmmm.... can't find the leaker eh? hint: Ginni 1 2 Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 23 minutes ago, commando said: hint: Ginni That was the first name that leapt to mind. Which may suggest that they identified the leaker, then said "oh f#&%" and declared it an unsolved mystery. 2 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 I said it elsewhere - with our state of politics and the conservativeness of the court if there was any way this could have been pinned to a liberal they would have done it. Because they can't/didn't I think we all know it was a conservative justice. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts