BigRedBuster Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 6 minutes ago, Hedley Lamarr said: You are quite the Roll Model want butter and honey on that? Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 20 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: want butter and honey on that? yes 1 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 5, 2022 Share Posted February 5, 2022 This is the type of linemen we need. Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 Returning Production according to Bill Connelly's SP+. https://www.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/33237908/college-football-teams-returning-production-2022-season 24 Ohio St 27 Iowa 40 Maryland 42 Mich St 47 Purdue 50 Minnesota 54 Rutgers 55 Indiana 67 Michgan 69 Northwestern 72 Penn St 85 Wisconsin 104 Nebraska (57% of offense and 57% of defense) 122 Illinois Quote A note about transfers With the transfer portal taking on ever-increasing importance in a team's roster construction, I attempt to account for transfers in both the returning production and recruiting pieces of the SP+ projections. Returning production: Quite crudely, if a player transfers from one FBS school to another, I mash his production from his previous team into the numerator and denominator for his new team. So if your quarterback leaves, and you bring in a transfer who was starting somewhere else -- a la USC, Ole Miss, Cincinnati and others -- that dampens the overall blow significantly. Because the translation from lower levels to upper is extremely inconsistent, I don't do this for players transferring up from FCS or Division II. I used to, but it didn't produce predictive value. Quote What these numbers mean for your team I have been collecting returning production data since 2014. Not including the 2021 season -- for reasons I'll address below -- about 8% of teams (equivalent to about 11 of 131) return at least 80% of overall production each year. On average, they improve by about 5.8 adjusted points per game in the following season's SP+ ratings. That's pretty significant. If a team ranked 20th in SP+ last year, adding 5.8 points to its rating would have bumped it to seventh. If a team ranked 40th, it would have jumped to 15th. On the other end, about 11% of teams (roughly 14 per season) return less than 50% of their production in a given season. That results in an average drop of about 6.3 adjusted points in SP+. If a team was 10th last year, losing 6.3 points would drop it to 27th. If it was 40th, it would fall to 67th. 1 Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 Ourlads has a projected 2022 depth chart posted: https://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-depth-charts/depth-chart/nebraska/91303 1 Quote Link to comment
admo Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 5 hours ago, Red Five said: Returning Production according to Bill Connelly's SP+. https://www.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/33237908/college-football-teams-returning-production-2022-season 24 Ohio St 27 Iowa 40 Maryland 42 Mich St 47 Purdue 50 Minnesota 54 Rutgers 55 Indiana 67 Michgan 69 Northwestern 72 Penn St 85 Wisconsin 104 Nebraska (57% of offense and 57% of defense) 122 Illinois 104th? Ok, but man... that puts us 13th out of 14 in the conference. No wonder we fired coaches, threw $$$ on the new ones, and hit the transfer portal hard. Fortunately I like the new staff and incoming players. Without all these moves, I can see us at 104 and owning it. Seriously. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 Booo…..I’ve never been a fan of playing on Fridays other than the one after thanksgiving. That’s for high school. Quote Link to comment
84HuskerLaw Posted February 11, 2022 Share Posted February 11, 2022 Hm? Top 25 in the off-season again! Good to know NU is back where we belong. Maybe they know something about Chubba that we haven’t seen yet? Quote Link to comment
NoLongerN Posted February 11, 2022 Share Posted February 11, 2022 4 hours ago, 84HuskerLaw said: Hm? Top 25 in the off-season again! Good to know NU is back where we belong. Maybe they know something about Chubba that we haven’t seen yet? My guess we are ranked higher than Iowa. Iowa SUCKS! Ha ha. Quote Link to comment
NativeJoe Posted February 11, 2022 Share Posted February 11, 2022 On 1/26/2022 at 9:19 AM, The Dude said: Yet he was the only runningback anywhere close to 7 yards a carry. I think ability is more important than what the scale says. And when you're a 250 lb man 10-15 lbs is negligible. That dude could take a healthy dump and lose 10 lbs. I think Yant would make a great linebacker. Quote Link to comment
NativeJoe Posted February 11, 2022 Share Posted February 11, 2022 On 1/25/2022 at 6:07 PM, suh_fan93 said: Looks like he's been keeping in shape to me. Gonna be a much more consistent RB room now with Held being gone. Looks like a linebacker, he could be really good at linebacker. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.