RichardHangslow Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 12 hours ago, Toe said: Something tells me your 'little bird' has a screw loose... G Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 4, 2022 Author Share Posted July 4, 2022 21 minutes ago, nic said: I am seeing ND, Stanford, Oregon and then let Washington join. Oregon and Stanford have remained quiet, correct? Not sure how schedules will play out. Probably protected rivalries or pods. PODS: PAC - USC, UCLA, Stanford, Washington, Oregon West - Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern East - Penn State, Maryland, Rutgers, Purdue, Notre Dame Midwest - Michigan, Michigan State, OSU, Illinois, Indiana ...or protected Games: Mich: OSU, MSU, Minn ND: USC, Stanford, Purdue NU: Wiscy, Iowa, Wash USC: UCLA, ND, PSU OSU: Mich, Illinois, PSU UCLA: USC, MSU, Washington Wiscy: Minn, NU, Oregon Minn: Wiscy, Mich, Iowa Wash: Oregon, NU, UCLA Oregon: Wash, Stanford, Wisconsin Stanford: ND, NW, Oregon Purdue: Indiana, ND, Rutgers Indiana: Purdue, MSU, Maryland Illinois: NW, OSU, Rutgers NW: Illinois, Stanford, Iowa Maryland: PSU, Rutgers, Indiana PSU: Maryland, OSU, USC Rutgers: Maryland, Illinois, Purdue Iowa: NU, Minnesota, NW MSU: Mich, UCLA, Indiana Divions: Old School: Indiana, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, MSU, Minnesota, OSU, NW, Wisconsin, Purdue Newbies: NU, PSU, Maryland, Rutgers, ND, USC, UCLA, Oregon, Washington, Stanford I think divisions are out. Probably out everywhere. The three protected games seems to be the rage right now. But I'm not sure they work with that many teams. The idea is to protect the most important rivalries but still get to play everyone else every-other year. I guess you could still do 4-5-5-5 with four protected games then play the other 15 teams every three years. But that's basically a pods system. I actually think the pods you posted look pretty good. But I've been a fan of pods for awhile. 1 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 4, 2022 Author Share Posted July 4, 2022 5 minutes ago, RichardHangslow said: Careful some guy named Toe on a internet message board might question if you have a screw loose. I know you, like me are seeking out his validation... I mean ... there does seem to be a pretty obvious distinction between teams that seem to be pretty likely candidates to be added and a team that had to back-door their way into a P5 conference in the first place and no one is talking about making another move. 2 Quote Link to comment
RichardHangslow Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 I get that, but would the B1G wanting a slice of the Texas market come as a huge shock to anyone? This after all is about money and adding 900k viewers you previously did not have probably is not a bad thing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 For as big and football-focused as the state of Texas is, there's really only two CFB teams that matter, and the ship has pretty much sailed on both of them. The next two biggest are both church-affiliated schools, and I don't see the Big Ten presidents going for any school in that category that isn't named Notre Dame. Quote Link to comment
84HuskerLaw Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 I believe USC and UCLA asked to be members. Not sure the Big Ten is sending out invitations yet. Maybe it’s only a minor distinction but I think legally it’s important. Big Ten is not wanting to be in the tampering business but sees itself open to considering offers. I do think 2-4 more additions would really boost the Big Ten (time for a new league name too) in to top dog position in market strength / brand power. SEC won’t sit still though. There are still some brand worthy schools to be had - FSU, Miami, Clemson, Ore, WU, ND, and UNC, and perhaps another dozen ??? It’s tough to say what schools cfb programs and fan bases are above the line. Imo, the upper limit # is probably around 64 but I can see the process ending up around 80. Still too many but much better than 140ish. There is big pot of $ but it can’t be split that many ways imo. There are enough prime time players each year to earn big bucks for that many teams. Just my sense of the macro economics of cfb at the top level. Quote Link to comment
Stumpy1 Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 Don’t be surprised if Miami starts getting brought up to go along with ND on joining the B1G. Quote Link to comment
nic Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 3 hours ago, RichardHangslow said: Careful some guy named Toe on a internet message board might question if you have a screw loose. I know you, like me are seeking out his validation... He wouldn't be wrong and I have been accused of worse. Quote Link to comment
nic Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 3 hours ago, Mavric said: I guess you could still do 4-5-5-5 with four protected games then play the other 15 teams every three years. But that's basically a pods system. I actually think the pods you posted look pretty good. But I've been a fan of pods for awhile. I put the divisions up to poke fun at the Big10. good point on the 4-5-5-5 being equivalent to the pods. I didn't think of that. I like the pods system too, and I can handle playing everyone every 3 years. That's better than it is now. ND would not like my pods though. The ND pod...because they are spoiled. ND, USC, Stanford, Purdue, UCLA (pulled in for USC) Quote Link to comment
RichardHangslow Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 14 minutes ago, nic said: He wouldn't be wrong and I have been accused of worse. Thanks nic! Quote Link to comment
Notre Dame Joe Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 22 hours ago, talaricohusker said: The college football news cycle sucks. And how the hell are we not get any more rumors or “inside” information My sources tell me the real sources are taking today off. Quote Link to comment
IgniteTheSpark Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 4 hours ago, 84HuskerLaw said: I believe USC and UCLA asked to be members. Not sure the Big Ten is sending out invitations yet. Maybe it’s only a minor distinction but I think legally it’s important. Big Ten is not wanting to be in the tampering business but sees itself open to considering offers. I do think 2-4 more additions would really boost the Big Ten (time for a new league name too) in to top dog position in market strength / brand power. SEC won’t sit still though. There are still some brand worthy schools to be had - FSU, Miami, Clemson, Ore, WU, ND, and UNC, and perhaps another dozen ??? It’s tough to say what schools cfb programs and fan bases are above the line. Imo, the upper limit # is probably around 64 but I can see the process ending up around 80. Still too many but much better than 140ish. There is big pot of $ but it can’t be split that many ways imo. There are enough prime time players each year to earn big bucks for that many teams. Just my sense of the macro economics of cfb at the top level. The ending number of 80 is way too big. It's way more likely to only be around 54-60. There's going to be some schools within the P5 on the outside looking in. With TV being the ones driving the boat. Why on God's earth does it make sense to take a ton of schools in the same areas? It doesn't. There are 4 schools I think are for sure screwed and have to be worried about what's going to happen with their institutions and programs. I think these 4 have to be 100 percent crapping themselves with all these expansion rumors etc. Oregon State Washington State Kansas State Iowa State Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 23 minutes ago, IgniteTheSpark said: The ending number of 80 is way too big. It's way more likely to only be around 54-60. There's going to be some schools within the P5 on the outside looking in. With TV being the ones driving the boat. Why on God's earth does it make sense to take a ton of schools in the same areas? It doesn't. There are 4 schools I think are for sure screwed and have to be worried about what's going to happen with their institutions and programs. I think these 4 have to be 100 percent crapping themselves with all these expansion rumors etc. Oregon State Washington State Kansas State Iowa State I'd add Colorado 1 Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 1 hour ago, IgniteTheSpark said: I think these 4 have to be 100 percent crapping themselves with all these expansion rumors etc. Oregon State Washington State Kansas State Iowa State I would say that about pretty much everyone left in the Big 12. At this point their biggest brand for football is what, Oklahoma State? Cincinnati? I mean they're good teams, but not exactly valuable brands in the CFB world, right? And at this point, it's the brands that matter most, even more than geographical markets. (Being in a big cable TV market isn't as important in the streaming era. Maryland and Rutgers are lucky they got in when they did.) Quote Link to comment
DrinkinwitTerrellFarley Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 I don't think UNC goes without Duke. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.