knapplc Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 Just now, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Fair point. Quote Link to comment
307husker Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 13 minutes ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Many of them wouldn't have much collegiate performance to evaluate, hence the transfer. 1 Quote Link to comment
Undone Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 33 minutes ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. I feel like I disagree with that actually. Doing it this way keeps a level playing field on who they were projected to be by analysts as compared to any other player. But I do see what you mean. 1 Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 4 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. IDK if that's the case with the numbers in the tweets, but the recruiting sites do update their scores for transfers. Though they might not have much additional footage to base the rating on vs when the player was in HS. Quote Link to comment
MyBloodIsRed16 Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 42 minutes ago, Toe said: IDK if that's the case with the numbers in the tweets, but the recruiting sites do update their scores for transfers. Though they might not have much additional footage to base the rating on vs when the player was in HS. I feel like from what I saw last year if you are a transfer that didn't play a lot or that well they basically just drop a star. Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted May 25, 2023 Share Posted May 25, 2023 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said: IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 3 Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted May 25, 2023 Share Posted May 25, 2023 Funny s#!t! Dang internet issues! Quote Link to comment
McGuillotine Posted May 25, 2023 Share Posted May 25, 2023 14 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said: Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted May 25, 2023 Share Posted May 25, 2023 14 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said: Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Disagree. The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements. Those are still there. A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff. Sooooooo do you disagree? 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment
Hilltop Posted June 2, 2023 Share Posted June 2, 2023 15 hours ago, The Murphinator said: Originally from Colorado- might be in the running if our coaches want him. Quote Link to comment
Huskerfollower4life Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 Has anybody questioned why HC Matt Rhule hasn't added more transfer to the team after the spring? Yes I know the roster was over the 85 scholarship limit and guys have left but do you think it's bc of that reason or bc HC Matt Rhule is confident with the team he has and doesn't really want to add guys to not be loyal to them? There are post spring transfers that can help like Barrett Miller. I know there isn't any guarantee's that just bc you add players they bring automatic success but you don't know unless you add them. Quote Link to comment
gobiggergoredder Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 14 minutes ago, Huskerfollower4life said: Has anybody questioned why HC Matt Rhule hasn't added more transfer to the team after the spring? Yes I know the roster was over the 85 scholarship limit and guys have left but do you think it's bc of that reason or bc HC Matt Rhule is confident with the team he has and doesn't really want to add guys to not be loyal to them? There are post spring transfers that can help like Barrett Miller. I know there isn't any guarantee's that just bc you add players they bring automatic success but you don't know unless you add them. Probably getting rid of Jacob Hood to make room. 1 4 Quote Link to comment
Huskerfollower4life Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 6 hours ago, gobiggergoredder said: Probably getting rid of Jacob Hood to make room. What's wrong with Jacob Hood? Yes it's going to take time for him to develop but I think he will eventually be a starter. May not be this season but I look forward to seeing him on the field next season. His upside his there and the experience of going up against guys in practice at Georgia can only help. Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted June 4, 2023 Share Posted June 4, 2023 1 hour ago, Huskerfollower4life said: What's wrong with Jacob Hood? Yes it's going to take time for him to develop but I think he will eventually be a starter. May not be this season but I look forward to seeing him on the field next season. His upside his there and the experience of going up against guys in practice at Georgia can only help. He has a weight management problem. It will be very telling how he has come back this summer how serious he is about playing. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.