Jump to content


Transfer Portal Targets 2022


Mavric

Recommended Posts

Just now, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

 

Fair point.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Many of them wouldn't have much collegiate performance to evaluate, hence the transfer.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

 

I feel like I disagree with that actually. Doing it this way keeps a level playing field on who they were projected to be by analysts as compared to any other player.

 

But I do see what you mean.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

 

IDK if that's the case with the numbers in the tweets, but the recruiting sites do update their scores for transfers. Though they might not have much additional footage to base the rating on vs when the player was in HS.

Link to comment
42 minutes ago, Toe said:

 

IDK if that's the case with the numbers in the tweets, but the recruiting sites do update their scores for transfers. Though they might not have much additional footage to base the rating on vs when the player was in HS.

I feel like from what I saw last year if you are a transfer that didn't play a lot or that well they basically just drop a star.  

Link to comment

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

11 hours ago, Dogs In A Pile said:

 

IMHO, this kind of star rating for transfers is absolutely worthless since they were based on their evaluation from high school. If they were based on their performance during their college careers that would be worth looking at.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
14 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said:

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

:waste

  • Plus1 1
  • Oh Yeah! 1
Link to comment
14 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said:

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Disagree.  The rating is based on potential using mechanics, athletic ability, agility & other measurements.  Those are still there.  A lot of these guys are young & buried on the depth chart and don't want to wait or not happy with the coaching staff.

Sooooooo do you disagree?

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 3
  • Oh Yeah! 1
Link to comment

Has anybody questioned why HC Matt Rhule hasn't added more transfer to the team after the spring?  Yes I know the roster was over the 85 scholarship limit and guys have left but do you think it's bc of that reason or bc HC Matt Rhule is confident with the team he has and doesn't really want to add guys to not be loyal to them?  There are post spring transfers that can help like Barrett Miller.  I know there isn't any guarantee's that just bc you add players they bring automatic success but you don't know unless you add them.

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Huskerfollower4life said:

Has anybody questioned why HC Matt Rhule hasn't added more transfer to the team after the spring?  Yes I know the roster was over the 85 scholarship limit and guys have left but do you think it's bc of that reason or bc HC Matt Rhule is confident with the team he has and doesn't really want to add guys to not be loyal to them?  There are post spring transfers that can help like Barrett Miller.  I know there isn't any guarantee's that just bc you add players they bring automatic success but you don't know unless you add them.

Probably getting rid of Jacob Hood to make room.

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
6 hours ago, gobiggergoredder said:

Probably getting rid of Jacob Hood to make room.

What's wrong with Jacob Hood?  Yes it's going to take time for him to develop but I think he will eventually be a starter.  May not be this season but I look forward to seeing him on the field next season.  His upside his there and the experience of going up against guys in practice at Georgia can only help.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Huskerfollower4life said:

What's wrong with Jacob Hood?  Yes it's going to take time for him to develop but I think he will eventually be a starter.  May not be this season but I look forward to seeing him on the field next season.  His upside his there and the experience of going up against guys in practice at Georgia can only help.

He has a weight management problem. It will be very telling how he has come back this summer how serious he is about playing. 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...