That article, Tacopina argued, constitutes a violation of the existing protective order by “someone on their side,” though he was quick to say he was not accusing Carroll’s counsel. 6/— Lisa Rubin (@lawofruby) April 26, 2023
That article, Tacopina argued, constitutes a violation of the existing protective order by “someone on their side,” though he was quick to say he was not accusing Carroll’s counsel. 6/