At least six wins and a minimum winning percentage of.500 are needed to officially be bowl-eligible, and 78 teams are needed to fill all of the bowls. So far, there are 70 eligible teams.
Eight team with 5 wins play each other so it's really 74. Then looking at the APR ranking there are more than 4 remaining with less than six wins that are ranked ahead of NU.
Eight team with 5 wins play each other so it's really 74. Then looking at the APR ranking there are more than 4 remaining with less than six wins that are ranked ahead of NU.
No, it's actually impossible barring several teams opting not to go to a bowl. See what I said above.It'll be interesting to see how the Huskers play on Friday. To keep the smallest of chances alive that they make a bowl game obviously they have to win. Couple that with this possibly being Riley's last game and the seniors, if they don't play inspired football on Friday it simply was never there. I doubt we make a bowl game this year. Fans probably wouldn't travel very well.
I believe the APR is very similar to 2015 but is down just a little. The bigger difference is other teams that have 4 and 5 wins now as compared to 2015.Did our APR fall or have other schools made improvements? Or both?
I think that offer expired when Pelini left.Nebraska is back and we’re here to stay
Why would it matter? Diaco's system handcuffs our players.Hopefully Nebraska approaches the Iowa game as if it’s their bowl game and just comes out on fire and put together a complete game and send the seniors out right.
Am I the only one who does not want this version of the Huskers to play in a bowl game? Normally an extra game has benefits like additional practice time, game experience, etc. I don't see where those things would do the program any good at this point. The quicker this current staff quits influencing these players the better IMO. It's time for a hard reset when the new coach comes in. Until then, I just hope for as little damage as possible.