I think that what we see is what we get. (Note-odd that we are recruiting physical DB's who can play press, but not using press at all) I do not think that Diaco plays chess while others are playing checkers. His end goal is simply to make the opposing teams get one less point than we do. That does equal wins, but I think it also allows for losses......... McCarron was 20/28 with 264 yards passing....Bama ran 45 times for 265yrds and had 2 guys over 100 yards...The final score was 42-14.....That's called breaking...They had some impressive wins and had two that went into OT. One of those was 3OT. ND won both of those. That's calling bending.....
Perhaps Bama was an anomaly. That D seemed solid throughout the season. NU has had several DC's, throughout numerous years and got pasted by a lot more than 42-14 by teams without near the firepower Bama had (on both sides of the ball).
Cally, Bo and Riley have collectively beaten the "we are holding something back" until later in the season.......Coaches coach to win. Its that simple. No coach holds back against the likes of SDSU, McNeese State or ASU in close games in the hopes to "let lose the dogs of war" against "better" competition. I would LOVE for Diaco to prove me wrong and restore my hope that some coaches do actually have a method to the madness of their "limited" schemes. But for now, I will be content that what we showed is what we are.