Another part of ESPN's coverage

bethelbacker

Special Teams Player
Good stuff

Really nothing we haven't already read from the local papers, but I thought it merited posting. I like the news on Ruud's continued development at the strongside position.

Also, if you read the piece about Oklahoma State, it appears the D-coordinator is trying to rip off the practice of giving out Blackshirts. Another piece of high comedy is OSU sports marketers calling the Cowboy's offense as "the most powerful offense in the world." Apparently Pacman Jones lent them some of his stash.

"The Cornhuskers have announced a $4 per game hike in season tickets, which will mean a per game average of $52 per home game this season. Part of the reason is an increased guarantee to nonconference opponents. "We've got to pay what we've got to pay," Nebraska athletic director Steve Pederson told the Omaha World-Herald. "It wasn't too many years ago we were talking about $250,000, sometimes $300,000 [per game]. Now, we're getting up to $750,000 per game."

Andre Jones has emerged as the likely replacement for injured CB Zack Bowman. But Nebraska defensive coordinator Kevin Cosgrove is insisting that Bowman will be back before the Cornhuskers' Sept. 1 opener against Nevada. LB Bo Ruud is thriving after moving from the weakside to strongside starting position. The move has opened starting positions for Ruud and Steve Octavien and also heightened Ruud's playmaking abilities. "It's a different thing schematically, but it's given me a chance to show my versatility. I'll do a wide variety of things and it's exciting to have that opportunity." Octavien is receiving some work at rush end in some formations this spring.

QB Sam Keller said that whoever emerges as the Cornhuskers' starting quarterback will benefit from the Cornhuskers' talented group of wide receivers, including Todd Peterson, Frantz Hardy, Terrence Nunn, Maurice Purify and Nate Swift. "You've got some guys who can really make plays," Keller said. "We've got five guys who can really produce. They all have their own strengths and it's going to be interesting to see how they are used." Ndamukong Suh has switched from nose tackle to the Cornhuskers' other starting defensive tackle slot for some snaps. "It gives you an overall view of what the front has to do as a whole," Suh told the Lincoln Journal-Star about the experiment. "That's an excellent thing to have multiple players on your front to play different positions."

I-back Cody Glenn has been hampered after aggravating his injured right ankle. K Jordan Congdon has left the Nebraska program for family reasons, returning to his home in San Diego. He is expected to transfer to Southern California, but must redshirt next season. His departure has opened the door for replacements Alex Henery and Jake Wesch, who are getting most of the work. Scholarship recruit Adi Kunalic will arrive in August. "

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"The Cornhuskers have announced a $4 per game hike in season tickets, which will mean a per game average of $52 per home game this season. Part of the reason is an increased guarantee to nonconference opponents. "We've got to pay what we've got to pay," Nebraska athletic director Steve Pederson told the Omaha World-Herald. "It wasn't too many years ago we were talking about $250,000, sometimes $300,000 [per game]. Now, we're getting up to $750,000 per game."
I don't understand this. Your always going to have that one lowly team looking for a payday. Take the lowest bidder.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
unless of course your schools doesn't want to play the lowly teams. Penn States, Notre Dames and whatnot want the money. and we want the Huskers to be beat down the Big Name teams to prove that the Order is Restored.

 
"The Cornhuskers have announced a $4 per game hike in season tickets, which will mean a per game average of $52 per home game this season. Part of the reason is an increased guarantee to nonconference opponents. "We've got to pay what we've got to pay," Nebraska athletic director Steve Pederson told the Omaha World-Herald. "It wasn't too many years ago we were talking about $250,000, sometimes $300,000 [per game]. Now, we're getting up to $750,000 per game."
I don't understand this. Your always going to have that one lowly team looking for a payday. Take the lowest bidder.
Plus those one lowly teams are in high demand lately, because they are the only teams willing to agree to an away game only, without a reciprocal home game. There was an article in the New York Times last fall about teams getting into bidding wars to play the University of Buffalo.

 
Boolah-Moolah Kickoff Time

Published: September 1, 2006

Let's give a cheer for the old University at Buffalo Bulls, perennially one of the worst teams in football, as they take the field this fall against two national powerhouses, Auburn and Wisconsin. Win or lose, the Bulls thereby double their appearance fees to $600,000 per game. ''It's all about the money,'' observed the head coach at West Virginia, sparing sports fans the how-you-play-the-game bromides after his team was unceremoniously dumped from Buffalo's schedule to make way for one of the power teams offering fatter paychecks.

Despite its 1-10 record last season, Buffalo's value for big-time opponents is rising because the National Collegiate Athletic Association has added an extra game to the season. Weak teams like Buffalo are thereby in greater demand as sure things on the winners' schedules. Buffalo will probably be humiliated on the field while its two new highly skilled opponents pocket easy victories in the competition for national ranking and bowl games, The Times's Pete Thamel reports.

It's a marketplace shift. Football is one of the few profitable college sports, and the 12th game will supply extra general revenue to university coffers. But that doesn't stop college officials from offering excuses: Weaker teams will be honed, not pulverized, by overwhelming opponents. Some of the extra money pays for weight machines and training rooms to groom underachievers into college football mammoths.

In boxing, where euphemisms are scarce, ''bum of the month'' is the traditional term for booking weaker opponents to fatten a prospect's record. But Buffalo's team deserves no so such slight. We wish we could say the same for college football's corporate masterminds.

 
Since the discussion is shifting towards scheduling powder puffs for an easy win. Does the BCS formula still include quality wins (such as against top opponents). If it did wouldn't that make you actually give a crap about scheduling non conference opponents? Like in the upcoming years when we have UCLA and Va Tech.

 
I may be wrong, but I think the quality-wins factor was taken out of the BCS formula. If it wasnt taken out, I know it was lessened to a degree. The reason to keep scheduling the big-time opponents is that even if the victory no longer impresses computers, it still impresses the voters. But I'll have to check to make sure they eliminated it.

 
I may be wrong, but I think the quality-wins factor was taken out of the BCS formula. If it wasnt taken out, I know it was lessened to a degree. The reason to keep scheduling the big-time opponents is that even if the victory no longer impresses computers, it still impresses the voters. But I'll have to check to make sure they eliminated it.
Thanks

 
Back
Top