Husker from Kansas
Starter
What about Darlington, the kid played in a system in high school that asked him to make alot of quick accurate throws and to read the defense. He could surprise some people!
So, let me get this straight. We have had a staff that everyone agrees couldn't develop a QB. We now have an HC that is known for developing QBs and all our QBs are going to improve but TA isn't.Based on how bad Tommy looked at times there's no way Stanton couldn't be better........Between the interceptions, fumbles, locking onto receivers, and flat out looking like a cry baby out thereAnd so you can say Stanton will be the starter based on what? He hasn't played.And what about that has anything to do with being next years starter? I think we've seen what Tommy has to offer....hard north and south runner can't move laterally....locks on to one receiver and an average passer at best.My money is on Tommy to be the starter next year. The guy has played a lot of games.
For god sakes Tommy went whole halves without completing passes
And he fumbles too muchbenjibean1 said:I dont think that TA could be a running back...he just takes to long to get started...he always looks like he is stuck in mudd until he gets his stride. He also seems very hesitant to pick a spot and go.BigRedPowerWagon said:Lets say Stanton is good enough to QB from here on out. Does Armstrong convert to WR or RB or would you see him saying f it and transfer out.
Darlington has a lot of potential and could make a case for starter or backup, but I question his health. Two very serious concussions in consecutive weeks to start his senior year of high school, a red shirt year to help him get healthy, and still some questions about his health. If he can get healthy, he's got potential.Husker from Kansas said:What about Darlington, the kid played in a system in high school that asked him to make alot of quick accurate throws and to read the defense. He could surprise some people!
I think they were getting coached, but Martinez sought help too improve his fundamentals. His throwing mechanics were terrible. And he did this too accommodate Beck's desire to be able too throw more.wiuhusker said:Going to throw out a question here. Is it possible that both Martinez and Armstrong got QB help in the off-season due to the lack of help they were getting during the season? Everyone on the board saw it as putting in extra time but it could damn well have been the only coaching they were getting that year.
Ya because we have to take the Bo Pelini depth chart seriously with Mark Pelini as our #1 centerDrunkOffPunch said:So based on speculation? If anybody has a chance to overtake TA I'd say it's Fyfe. He was second string after all.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:Based on how bad Tommy looked at times there's no way Stanton couldn't be better........Between the interceptions, fumbles, locking onto receivers, and flat out looking like a cry baby out thereDrunkOffPunch said:And so you can say Stanton will be the starter based on what? He hasn't played.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:And what about that has anything to do with being next years starter? I think we've seen what Tommy has to offer....hard north and south runner can't move laterally....locks on to one receiver and an average passer at best.NebraskaHarry said:My money is on Tommy to be the starter next year. The guy has played a lot of games.
For god sakes Tommy went whole halves without completing passes
What do you know of Stanton outside of the Elite 11 camp?Ya because we have to take the Bo Pelini depth chart seriously with Mark Pelini as our #1 centerDrunkOffPunch said:So based on speculation? If anybody has a chance to overtake TA I'd say it's Fyfe. He was second string after all.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:Based on how bad Tommy looked at times there's no way Stanton couldn't be better........Between the interceptions, fumbles, locking onto receivers, and flat out looking like a cry baby out thereDrunkOffPunch said:And so you can say Stanton will be the starter based on what? He hasn't played.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:And what about that has anything to do with being next years starter? I think we've seen what Tommy has to offer....hard north and south runner can't move laterally....locks on to one receiver and an average passer at best.NebraskaHarry said:My money is on Tommy to be the starter next year. The guy has played a lot of games.
For god sakes Tommy went whole halves without completing passes![]()
That's what I want to know.......how good is Darlington.Husker from Kansas said:What about Darlington, the kid played in a system in high school that asked him to make alot of quick accurate throws and to read the defense. He could surprise some people!
It will be a even field in the spring, if Tommy wants to keep the staring job he will have to prove to Riley that he is the best one for ithusker98 said:If Stanton was so much better than Armstrong why is he number three on the depth chart..... And don't tell me preferential treatment I don't buy it in this case.
It will be interesting too see how he develops under Riley but i honestly think we will see Stanton start only one season as a red shirt senior after Tommy Graduates.
And something too many of the stanton crowd don't understand is that, and this is from Riley himself, his offense is flexible. It is the sum of its parts so too speak. What ever this offense strengths are that is what they will do. Right now we are a run first team with an option QB. So next years offense isn't that much of a mystery.
This means we are not guaranteed too run a pro style offense next year just because our third string QB fits his offense.
I have heard rumblings that Stanton is pretty accurate at times, but he locks onto the first read and tends to throw it there no matter what. Sound familiar? Good to see we have someone coming in that can actually coach up the QBs. I don't think there is a lack of talent at the position, there has only been a lack of coaching.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:Based on how bad Tommy looked at times there's no way Stanton couldn't be better........Between the interceptions, fumbles, locking onto receivers, and flat out looking like a cry baby out thereDrunkOffPunch said:And so you can say Stanton will be the starter based on what? He hasn't played.BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS said:And what about that has anything to do with being next years starter? I think we've seen what Tommy has to offer....hard north and south runner can't move laterally....locks on to one receiver and an average passer at best.NebraskaHarry said:My money is on Tommy to be the starter next year. The guy has played a lot of games.
For god sakes Tommy went whole halves without completing passes
He's not going to leave and I'd bet he starts. His biggest problem, Beck, will be gone and this should have happened long ago. Hopefully with a new S&C staff and OLC the OL can give him better protection.JohnnyOneNut said:My take is that he ends up leaving the program or else just becomes irrelevant.
He doesn't have the tools to run Riley's offense. He could barely run ours (see his completion % vs winning teams); let alone a pro style .
The last interesting nugget is that Riley was interested in Stanton out of high school
Will be interesting to see how a new coach sees the position considering Pelini was pretty well known for loyalty to starters despite how bad they played and/or who was behind them