loss-loss-loss.......which would suck
Maybe in your wild world of symmetry... But most would see it loss-loss-loss.loss-loss-loss.......which would suck
Actually the correct pattern would be loss win win......... and that would still suck because it isn't win win win.... but atleast we'd be going to dallas.
A pattern emerges!Maybe in your wild world of symmetry... But most would see it loss-loss-loss.loss-loss-loss.......which would suck
Actually the correct pattern would be loss win win......... and that would still suck because it isn't win win win.... but atleast we'd be going to dallas.
I'm struggling to see that as a pattern.Maybe in your wild world of symmetry... But most would see it loss-loss-loss.loss-loss-loss.......which would suck
Actually the correct pattern would be loss win win......... and that would still suck because it isn't win win win.... but atleast we'd be going to dallas.
after every two wins we lose with the losses increasing by one.I'm struggling to see that as a pattern.Maybe in your wild world of symmetry... But most would see it loss-loss-loss.loss-loss-loss.......which would suck
Actually the correct pattern would be loss win win......... and that would still suck because it isn't win win win.... but atleast we'd be going to dallas.
i have to disagree with you, given the set involved and the finite number of variables, it would most logically be A A B A A B B A A B B B. Because there are only 12 spaces, that best suits the pattern; the 'blank blank blank' locks in your options. Think jazz, not blues... but this is not a song.That pattern is definitely not set. If it were a song and a rhythm it would be win win loss win win loss loss win win loss win win loss loss and so on.
Three losses doesn't really fit with the established pattern. If it were like this then that would make sense:
win, loss, win, win, loss, loss, win, win, win, loss loss loss and so on.
Just sayin.
:yeahi have to disagree with you, given the set involved and the finite number of variables, it would most logically be A A B A A B B A A B B B. Because there are only 12 spaces, that best suits the pattern; the 'blank blank blank' locks in your options. Think jazz, not blues... but this is not a song.That pattern is definitely not set. If it were a song and a rhythm it would be win win loss win win loss loss win win loss win win loss loss and so on.
Three losses doesn't really fit with the established pattern. If it were like this then that would make sense:
win, loss, win, win, loss, loss, win, win, win, loss loss loss and so on.
Just sayin.
not to dedhoarse , but there are two patterns. One, we win two at a time; Two, each time we lose, it is followed by an increase in one. that is probably to most succinct way to explain it.:yeahi have to disagree with you, given the set involved and the finite number of variables, it would most logically be A A B A A B B A A B B B. Because there are only 12 spaces, that best suits the pattern; the 'blank blank blank' locks in your options. Think jazz, not blues... but this is not a song.That pattern is definitely not set. If it were a song and a rhythm it would be win win loss win win loss loss win win loss win win loss loss and so on.
Three losses doesn't really fit with the established pattern. If it were like this then that would make sense:
win, loss, win, win, loss, loss, win, win, win, loss loss loss and so on.
Just sayin.
it's just an interesting happenstance. i forgot the mods prohibit cognitive stimulation.At least in this pattern we win our bowl game...but in all seriousness, like the other poster stated, this whole concept is retarded