Big 10 Done With Expansion

He did, and he had a pretty good argument especially for Arkansas. Why stay in a conference where you'll probably always be second fiddle when you could be top dog? Boise State would cause a lot of geographic problems.

 
junior4949 said:
He did, and he had a pretty good argument especially for Arkansas. Why stay in a conference where you'll probably always be second fiddle when you could be top dog? Boise State would cause a lot of geographic problems.
Click to expand...
Arkansas will never go back to Tejas. How dumb does Boise State look now? Shoot the MWC would have been a better conference than the Big lEast had Utah, BYU and TCU stayed. Now Boise is looking a a similar situation that they are already in. Ouch. The glare of the blue turf must have been clouding their vision when they made that move.

 
junior4949 said:
He did, and he had a pretty good argument especially for Arkansas. Why stay in a conference where you'll probably always be second fiddle when you could be top dog? Boise State would cause a lot of geographic problems.
Click to expand...
Arkansas is going to be top dog over Oklahoma and Texas? I'd like some of what you're having.

 
HuskerJosh said:
junior4949 said:
He did, and he had a pretty good argument especially for Arkansas. Why stay in a conference where you'll probably always be second fiddle when you could be top dog? Boise State would cause a lot of geographic problems.
Click to expand...
Arkansas is going to be top dog over Oklahoma and Texas? I'd like some of what you're having.
Click to expand...
Agree, Arkansas has already beens screwed by Texas.

In this situation:

Arkansas = Nebraska

SEC = Big Ten

Nebraska would likely not be willing go to a conference with Texas at the helm and neither would Arkansas.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top