It'sNotAFakeID
All-American
Go to NEXT POST
Last edited by a moderator:
yes, but his was much more intense.Didn't Knapp just make a similar thread this afternoon?
People keep using Oregon and Bama in the same sentence! I just don't get it. They've had some success but IMO they are nowhere near the same caliber as Alabama. Ask the powers that be at Oregon if they would trade their last decade of success for 5 national titles and 3 heisman trophies in their trophy case.Nine wins is nothing to sneeze at and I guess the numbers don't lie, but as far as passing the eye, ears, nose and gut test, Nebraska doesn't sit at the same table as Oregon and Alabama.
I agree, but if we're going to play which one of these doesn't belong, Nebraska over the past 6 seasons doesn't merit mentioning with either Bama or Oregon. I think we all realize that and want something much more substantial than a 9 win paper lion stat that is highly attributable to a plethora of less than stellar competition. Maybe I'm strange and have some bygone sense of entitlement but I am really not impressed at all with this nine win deal. Sure it's better than eight or fewer but it loses it's luster when you factor in the games where we beat ourselves, got blown out, and have no signature wins or hardware to show for the effort. Here's to hoping for brighter and better in the immediate future.People keep using Oregon and Bama in the same sentence! I just don't get it. They've had some success but IMO they are nowhere near the same caliber as Alabama. Ask the powers that be at Oregon if they would trade their last decade of success for 5 national titles and 3 heisman trophies in their trophy case.Nine wins is nothing to sneeze at and I guess the numbers don't lie, but as far as passing the eye, ears, nose and gut test, Nebraska doesn't sit at the same table as Oregon and Alabama.
Agreed.It's impressive and nothing to sneeze at, but also not quite as impressive as it appears on the surface (like if you're just looking at stats and not analyzing patterns that we see season after season). The end result for me is that although some recurring problems were not fixed, there were definite signs of improvement in the second half of the season. Doubly so considering the injuries we had. So I'd like to see what this staff can do next season.
Is anyone else shocked to see that TCU finished this high? Who knew?TCU 4 H2 L14 2011 7.3
Remember that they had that good season a few years ago. I think they ended up beating Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl. Of course, it was a lot easier to achieve better records when the teams they were playing on a regular basis weren't Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, etc... That's evidenced by the last time they finished in the Top 25 being two years ago.Is anyone else shocked to see that TCU finished this high? Who knew?TCU 4 H2 L14 2011 7.3
They're not, but to discredit their run is pretty ill-advised.People keep using Oregon and Bama in the same sentence! I just don't get it. They've had some success but IMO they are nowhere near the same caliber as Alabama. Ask the powers that be at Oregon if they would trade their last decade of success for 5 national titles and 3 heisman trophies in their trophy case.Nine wins is nothing to sneeze at and I guess the numbers don't lie, but as far as passing the eye, ears, nose and gut test, Nebraska doesn't sit at the same table as Oregon and Alabama.