HSKRNOKC
Heisman Trophy Winner
You are absolutely correct. BTW great game against K- Sucks U. Congrats.This is the exact lack of emotion that everyone has been talking about. This guy is the first coach that HAS to go probably right now.
You are absolutely correct. BTW great game against K- Sucks U. Congrats.This is the exact lack of emotion that everyone has been talking about. This guy is the first coach that HAS to go probably right now.
I doubt we will see Cosgrove leave until the end of the season and even then I will be surprised. Callahan better take control of this team and get things going in the right direction. His job depends on it.One thing that stood out to me was in his post game radio show with Jim Rose they talked about the defense and BC said something to the affect of "there are some changes that need to be made on defense and I will take a look at that." Maybe that is my eternal optimism but in the past it would always be WE will take a look at that....maybe this is a hint that he has finally figured it out. For the sake of Husker Nation I hope so.
That's a great post with refreshing insight here.I do not believe Callahan hired Cosgrove simply BECAUSE they are friends. In coaching you HAVE to win, so I don't think that he would put his own success in jeopardy to help a friend....a friend who had a pretty good job before he was hired here.
I think that Callahan really thought Cosgrove would give him the best chance for success....period.....or he would not have hired him. Now that may be because they know each other well and Bill figured that they would work well together....but of course he was trying to make a decision that would increase his chance for success.
And i really think this is MORE of a problem than if he would have hired him ONLY because they were friends. He made a very poor business decision when he hired Cosgrove. It shows a lack of judgment and the inability to make these types of decision.
We played the 3-3-5 which is what we used last year to be Mizzou. He did try to switch to a 4-man front and it did worse than the 3-3-5. There was no scheme that would have stopped them. It came down to poor play, which goes back to practice and the fact that the coaches have not developed these kids well at all, and the overall lack of enthusiasm on defense.I am repeating what I said in a previous post so forgive me. Callahan and the defensive minds must have come together in the middle of last week to discuss their strategy for the Missouri game I presume. Then I assume Cosgrove takes front stage and discusses what they plan to do for the upcoming game. At any point in time during this process wouldn't you think Callahan would stand up a say "Please, give me something better than this. Is this the best you can do"?
I would have listened for a couple minutes and put an absolute stop to that crappy game plan. How can you basically play a prevent defense for the ENTIRE game? Players out of their natural position, no aggressive calls, etc. Did they honestly think that strategy would work? Never in the history on mankind has that type of game plann won a game. It was like watching Missouri running the 2 minute offense against a team that was up by 20 and just didn't want to give up the BIG play. Well, they certainly had enough of those.
I have been watching football long enough to know that you must, I repeat must put pressure on the offensive team by any means possible. Rushing 3 players (a couple linebackers at times) is not going to cut it. Any QB in College could have picked our defense apart. Hell, I could've and I am 44 years old and have bad knees.
We have hundreds and hundreds of hours of practice during the year and this is the best product we can put forth? I really feel sorry for the DBs. I really feel that they could make some plays if the QBs would be under more pressure.