For the sake of perspective, here are Alabama's 2009 offensive rankings. The numbers in red parentheses are Nebraska's 2009 offensive rankings.
#12 in Rushing Offense (#62)
#92 in Passing Offense (#101)
#42 in Total Offense (#99)
#22 in Scoring Offense (#75)
#5 in Interceptions Thrown (#51)
#34 in Passing Efficiency (#79)
#15 in Fumbles Lost (#60)
#3 in Turnovers Lost (#57)
#24 in Tackles For Loss Allowed (#30)
#36 in Sacks Allowed (#31)
#42 in First Downs (#111)
#62 in 3rd Down Conversions (#69)
#28 in 4th Down Conversions (#24)
#29 in Red Zone Efficiency (#69)
#5 in Time Of Possession (#47)
Judging by the rankings, Bama was a very good ball control + power running offense with very few mistakes and ate up a lot of clock in the process. They played smart football. They weren't world beaters but they didn't have to be because they had a stout defense.
#12 in Rushing Offense (#62)
#92 in Passing Offense (#101)
#42 in Total Offense (#99)
#22 in Scoring Offense (#75)
#5 in Interceptions Thrown (#51)
#34 in Passing Efficiency (#79)
#15 in Fumbles Lost (#60)
#3 in Turnovers Lost (#57)
#24 in Tackles For Loss Allowed (#30)
#36 in Sacks Allowed (#31)
#42 in First Downs (#111)
#62 in 3rd Down Conversions (#69)
#28 in 4th Down Conversions (#24)
#29 in Red Zone Efficiency (#69)
#5 in Time Of Possession (#47)
Judging by the rankings, Bama was a very good ball control + power running offense with very few mistakes and ate up a lot of clock in the process. They played smart football. They weren't world beaters but they didn't have to be because they had a stout defense.