Depth Chart out

Caveman...nice insight I was wondering myself why he wasn't anywhere on the depth chart and what you said makes perfect sense. I am also very happy to see that Curenski and Bell are both 2's. I really like the speed we have there this year.

 
what i notice is thenarse is still not in the top slot on the chart? how is this guy such a fan favorite and just CANNOT put it together to start?

 
Fuzzy said:
Its funny how everyone on the depth chart is pretty much where i have everyone on NCAA 2010. haha.

Oh yea i was gonna ask, what do the letters mean?
Click to expand...
How many times that person has lettered, I'm guessing. Not sure what that is on the college level, in HS it was something like playing in 15 quarters or something terribly easy.

Personally, I'm surprised there is an OR between West and Dennard. I know alot of people on here don't like west, but I felt like he did a pretty good job last year, good at playing physically at the line. Must mean that Dennard has really come along, he looked promising in flashes last year. Also since Paul is our best reciever, I wonder how much we will actually see him returning punts/ kicks? I guess swift still returned alot of punts last year so maybe it doesn't matter.

 
JTrain said:
Why do we continue to list a fullback on the depth chart? Nostalgia?
Click to expand...
that's true...we can't be running with a base I-form anymore. it'd be more appropriate to put either a second HB or a second TE or a third WR. but those are all on there so i don't think it matters.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top