Depth needed very badly

johnny_husker

Four-Star Recruit
This is why I think we have not done as well as we should be doing.

Look at how many injured players we have and no depth to step in.

The teams that are beating us have that depth.

After BC has wrapped up a few recuting years we will have the depth we need.

Another thing.....

Is there something wrong with letting Rigoni(sp?) give LB a try?????

He is an ANIMAL!!!!!!

 
Rigoni comes in on the punting/kickoff to knock someones head off and fire us up, I am not sure his 5-6 frame could handle at LB...he would get pushed around reguardless of his huge he makes on sp. teams...

 
It is amazing to me that taylor has not been carried off the field yet. It is no wonder he looks terrible at times. even when he has time in the back of his mnd he has to think he is gonna get lit up everytime. Dogwaste that is the only way to describe the O-line play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
13 Sacks on Zac Taylor for a loss of 100 yards

16 QB hurries causing 4 interceptions

20 tackles for a loss of 110 yards

Those are just against our offensive line the last 2 games. Our offensive line has been exposed and OU did to our left side what Missouri did. Oklahoma even implimented the spin move on that side. The offensive line has allowed 24 sacks through 8 games and we still have 3 or 4 more games to go. Last year we had 16 sacks the whole season. Our offensive line is the major reason why we have lost 2 of the 3 games this year (Missouri, Oklahoma). The third loss was just a freak loss in my opinion. The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.

 
The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.
This point is arguable in the last few games, the running game only really works when your not playing catchup with the opponent. Being down by 3 TD's doesn't help us try and establish the run game.

Although there is no excuse for the Oline pass protection (or lack thereof) but when your playing from a deficit from the get go it will stifle the ability to run. I did see good passing/catching with the short game, but trying to go downfield was the problem. Saw Taylor holding onto that ball way to long a few times, especially with the knowledge that the Oline is weak. With this Oline they shouldn't be throwing deep balls, not sure if that was by call or Taylors choice but either way it should have been rectified once the game got close.

 
as stated above, there is no question why we do not throw the long ball....O line can't block and we have no WR with great speed or moves....WR's, OL, DB's, that is on my Xmas wish list for the Red!

hunter

 
The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.
This point is arguable in the last few games, the running game only really works when your not playing catchup with the opponent. Being down by 3 TD's doesn't help us try and establish the run game.

Although there is no excuse for the Oline pass protection (or lack thereof) but when your playing from a deficit from the get go it will stifle the ability to run. I did see good passing/catching with the short game, but trying to go down field was the problem. Saw Taylor holding onto that ball way to long a few times, especially with the knowledge that the Oline is weak. With this Oline they shouldn't be throwing deep balls, not sure if that was by call or Taylors choice but either way it should have been rectified once the game got close.
It is like you said arguable. I saw a Texas team that was down 28-9 to Oklahoma St and the rushing game is what got them back into it for the most part. Vince Young was horrible throwing the ball in the first half, and then when they got the rushing game going, it opened up the lanes. Texas got 475 of its 600 yards in the second half (200 of it came from rushing)

But then again, we don't have the talent Texas does

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.
This point is arguable in the last few games, the running game only really works when your not playing catchup with the opponent. Being down by 3 TD's doesn't help us try and establish the run game.

Although there is no excuse for the Oline pass protection (or lack thereof) but when your playing from a deficit from the get go it will stifle the ability to run. I did see good passing/catching with the short game, but trying to go downfield was the problem. Saw Taylor holding onto that ball way to long a few times, especially with the knowledge that the Oline is weak. With this Oline they shouldn't be throwing deep balls, not sure if that was by call or Taylors choice but either way it should have been rectified once the game got close.
Can't say I agree - at least to the premise that the team can't run because it's behind. I would agree if your point was that the deficit forces the team to the pass, but that didn't seem to be your premise, since your reply was to ######'s assertion that the reason we haven't been able to run this year is the offensive line.

With a deficit, the defenders are going to be looking for the pass. That should actually make it easier to run. Not as many in the box. The fact that we cannot gain yards running under those circumstances, if any thing, is an even greater indictment of the play of the offensive line. That should make it easier to rip off a few long gains. It is true that you can't run the majority of the time when behind - but when you do run from a deficit, you should have fewer defenders in the immediate vicinity of the line.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
13 Sacks on Zac Taylor for a loss of 100 yards16 QB hurries causing 4 interceptions

20 tackles for a loss of 110 yards

Those are just against our offensive line the last 2 games. Our offensive line has been exposed and OU did to our left side what Missouri did. Oklahoma even implimented the spin move on that side. The offensive line has allowed 24 sacks through 8 games and we still have 3 or 4 more games to go. Last year we had 16 sacks the whole season. Our offensive line is the major reason why we have lost 2 of the 3 games this year (Missouri, Oklahoma). The third loss was just a freak loss in my opinion. The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.
Second that, well put!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The OL is also the reason we haven't been able to get a rushing game going all season long.
This point is arguable in the last few games, the running game only really works when your not playing catchup with the opponent. Being down by 3 TD's doesn't help us try and establish the run game.

Although there is no excuse for the Oline pass protection (or lack thereof) but when your playing from a deficit from the get go it will stifle the ability to run. I did see good passing/catching with the short game, but trying to go downfield was the problem. Saw Taylor holding onto that ball way to long a few times, especially with the knowledge that the Oline is weak. With this Oline they shouldn't be throwing deep balls, not sure if that was by call or Taylors choice but either way it should have been rectified once the game got close.
Can't say I agree - at least to the premise that the team can't run because it's behind. I would agree if your point was that the deficit forces the team to the pass, but that didn't seem to be your premise, since your reply was to ######'s assertion that the reason we haven't been able to run this year is the offensive line.

With a deficit, the defenders are going to be looking for the pass. That should actually make it easier to run. Not as many in the box. The fact that we cannot gain yards running under those circumstances, if any thing, is an even greater indictment of the play of the offensive line. That should make it easier to rip off a few long gains. It is true that you can't run the majority of the time when behind - but when you do run from a deficit, you should have fewer defenders in the immediate vicinity of the line.
Maybe I should have stated that the playcalling seems to go more passing then rushing once we get behind. I am not positive on the play selection but it seemed like it was a 2:<1 ratio of pass/run once we got down and so even if the rush is still possible its not implemented.

 
Back
Top