Detroit TD Catch, and another observation...

T

TRIPP

Special Teams Player
As most or all of us probably have seen. I feel the Detroit TD catch was a catch, but i also agree with the rules so it sucks to be a lions fan. But i dont know if anybody else noticed, but in the Titans game, when Young threw the 56 yard bomb to washington, before washington even touched the ground in the end zone he threw the ball. I havent been able to find a replay to slow it down, but i dont think his feet even touch in the endzone and he tosses the ball. How is that a TD? i know its once the ball crosses the line, but how can you not call that a fumble or something when Calvin Johnson made a great catch and it gets over turned?

side note- im a vikings fan so i dont really care about it, but i seen that Td pass last night and was like he didnt even touch the endzone before he tossed the ball.

 
That Detroit call was definitely close. It looked to me like Calvin Johnson twisted his body and took a step, then lost the ball as he was putting it on the ground to balance himself. Too bad such a close call decides the game. Oh well, I'd be more upset except if I wasn't a Bears fan.

You gotta admit that Zach Bowman had pretty good coverage on Johnson. A guy who is hard to cover.

 
I had the impression that Johnson felt like he had already established possession, which under the old rules he had, so he just kind of let go of the ball when it hit the ground, well after his body hit.

 
thats how i seen it. He felt he caught it, came down with it and then was getting up to celebrate and since he dropped it, they call it no good.

anybody else see the Titans game though? i swear he didnt even cross the goal line before he tossed the ball in celebration

 
nuance said:
Oh well, I'd be more upset except if I wasn't a Bears fan.
Click to expand...
I'm a Bears fan and I even said it was a TD. The real question is how long does somebody have to have possession to be considered a catch. From my prespective CJ had possession as soon as he caught the ball with two feet in the endzone and fell on his left knee while palming the ball with full possession. He then landed on his rear end and turned around while on the ground while placing the ball on the ground and pushed off of it to celebrate the game winning TD, something that I believe anybody would've done after catching the game winner.

Does a player have to have like a 20-30 second (a little exaggeration here) time frame to have full possession because it seemed like that was the case for the CJ call yesterday.

 
these guys are getting paid millions to play, maybe he should hang on to the dang ball and make sure it's a touchdown before running of to showboat.

 
huskerjock said:
nuance said:
Oh well, I'd be more upset except if I wasn't a Bears fan.
Click to expand...
I'm a Bears fan and I even said it was a TD. The real question is how long does somebody have to have possession to be considered a catch. From my prespective CJ had possession as soon as he caught the ball with two feet in the endzone and fell on his left knee while palming the ball with full possession. He then landed on his rear end and turned around while on the ground while placing the ball on the ground and pushed off of it to celebrate the game winning TD, something that I believe anybody would've done after catching the game winner.

Does a player have to have like a 20-30 second (a little exaggeration here) time frame to have full possession because it seemed like that was the case for the CJ call yesterday.
Click to expand...
I was wondering about that myself. Would it have been a catch if he had spiked the ball as he twisted around. Instead of keeping it in his grasp and taking it to the ground? I think that might have been a TD, even though *less* time of possession.

 
in the next game, he should catch the ball and hold onto it for a good 1-2 minutes just to make sure they know he has control...that would be funny.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top