Thanks_Tom RR
All-American
I have been thinking about this for a while, and starting putting some data together to make the argument (but haven't had the time to finish). However, here is my premise. Bo was hired to win in the Big 12. Bo's first 3 yrs were in the Big 12 and full of fervor, built from solid defensive play and 3 straight Division titles (2 conference title game appearances). From there, we moved to the B1G, and led to some major loses to some power run teams and only 1 of 4 years ending with a Division title/CCG appearance.
In the B1G, most of the loses were not close, and I look at how Bo's defense was designed to stop the spread throwing teams in the Big 12 perfectly (2 safeties high, man-on-man coverage, contain by the front four) but could not stop a run heavy team like those in the B1G.
In the end, Bo's needed to look at the conference switch as a time to not just change recruiting strategies but the defensive philosophy. He did not do that, it is what it is.
In the B1G, most of the loses were not close, and I look at how Bo's defense was designed to stop the spread throwing teams in the Big 12 perfectly (2 safeties high, man-on-man coverage, contain by the front four) but could not stop a run heavy team like those in the B1G.
In the end, Bo's needed to look at the conference switch as a time to not just change recruiting strategies but the defensive philosophy. He did not do that, it is what it is.