This is very true. When you look at just conference games Rex's avg falls to 4.3 and 8 scores over 8 games. Not overly impressive. Close to half his production came from the creampuff non con, basically 40% of his yards and 50% of his tds. He is a nice player and as kchusker_chris said, consistent and reliable. But unless his numbers really blow up and his has a couple showcase games, the heisman is a pipe dream.Maybe, but the Heisman is based on a lot of statistics...and pre-season hype is primarily based on the prior year. There are a dozen running backs returning that racked up more yards than Rex. If you go by YPC he didn't even finish in the top 100 rushers last year. Ball averaged 6.26 yards a carry. James 7.31. Rex 4.8.
Rex is by far my favorite Husker - but at this point I don't think he deserves to be in the discussion averaging 104 yards a game. He's consistent and reliable, but he's never really ever taken over a game. A Heisman candidate does that 3-4 times a season...minimum.
Maybe, but the Heisman is based on a lot of statistics...and pre-season hype is primarily based on the prior year. There are a dozen running backs returning that racked up more yards than Rex. If you go by YPC he didn't even finish in the top 100 rushers last year. Ball averaged 6.26 yards a carry. James 7.31. Rex 4.8.
Rex is by far my favorite Husker - but at this point I don't think he deserves to be in the discussion averaging 104 yards a game. He's consistent and reliable, but he's never really ever taken over a game. A Heisman candidate does that 3-4 times a season...minimum.
Yeah, I agree with Newton as well. The way I look at is "how good is that team without him?" Ingram? Bama still wins it all without him. Auburn? No. This also makes a huge case for Suh. It just seems to be that "best player on the best team" thing going on anymore. For instance the momentary hype for Weeden last year. Where would OK St be without him? I dont know, but I tend to think Joe Daily could throw passes to Justin Blackmon and be in the heisman race.I definitely agreed w/ Griffin - but I thought Newton was equally deserving the year before (probably more so - Luck was a great player as well this year). I don't disagree with many of the winners. Ingram I'm not so sure on - but before that I think the best guy had won for a number of years.
What I don't really agree w/ is the finalists, and usually the final order. Suh should have finished higher. More defensive guys should be standing up there. Stuff like that. But the winner for the most part has a solid argument for why they won most years.
I agree with this. Rex is an extremely reliable player, but he's not the star studded game breaker. He's more like the patron saint of consistency.Maybe, but the Heisman is based on a lot of statistics...and pre-season hype is primarily based on the prior year. There are a dozen running backs returning that racked up more yards than Rex. If you go by YPC he didn't even finish in the top 100 rushers last year. Ball averaged 6.26 yards a carry. James 7.31. Rex 4.8.
Rex is by far my favorite Husker - but at this point I don't think he deserves to be in the discussion averaging 104 yards a game. He's consistent and reliable, but he's never really ever taken over a game. A Heisman candidate does that 3-4 times a season...minimum.
This is very true. When you look at just conference games Rex's avg falls to 4.3 and 8 scores over 8 games. Not overly impressive. Close to half his production came from the creampuff non con, basically 40% of his yards and 50% of his tds. He is a nice player and as kchusker_chris said, consistent and reliable. But unless his numbers really blow up and his has a couple showcase games, the heisman is a pipe dream.Maybe, but the Heisman is based on a lot of statistics...and pre-season hype is primarily based on the prior year. There are a dozen running backs returning that racked up more yards than Rex. If you go by YPC he didn't even finish in the top 100 rushers last year. Ball averaged 6.26 yards a carry. James 7.31. Rex 4.8.
Rex is by far my favorite Husker - but at this point I don't think he deserves to be in the discussion averaging 104 yards a game. He's consistent and reliable, but he's never really ever taken over a game. A Heisman candidate does that 3-4 times a season...minimum.
This is very true. When you look at just conference games Rex's avg falls to 4.3 and 8 scores over 8 games. Not overly impressive. Close to half his production came from the creampuff non con, basically 40% of his yards and 50% of his tds. He is a nice player and as kchusker_chris said, consistent and reliable. But unless his numbers really blow up and his has a couple showcase games, the heisman is a pipe dream.Maybe, but the Heisman is based on a lot of statistics...and pre-season hype is primarily based on the prior year. There are a dozen running backs returning that racked up more yards than Rex. If you go by YPC he didn't even finish in the top 100 rushers last year. Ball averaged 6.26 yards a carry. James 7.31. Rex 4.8.
Rex is by far my favorite Husker - but at this point I don't think he deserves to be in the discussion averaging 104 yards a game. He's consistent and reliable, but he's never really ever taken over a game. A Heisman candidate does that 3-4 times a season...minimum.
he seldom takes it to the house nor is he a threat to.......wihtout that you don't get the nod.