I mean, Suh is a rookie and first team All Pro means he would be one of the top 2 defensive tackles in the game right now.
He certainly merits consideration and I won't argue that he has had an AMAZING first year and deserves to be up there. But I can't slam Dirk too bad for just saying he doesn't think he's top 2 yet. I don't know my DTs very well, but I'll throw out Vince Wilfork's name out there and figure there have to be some pretty worthy DT candidates elsewhere around the league, too. Haloti Ngata's the other guy named here, and that dude's a beast in his own right.
They are fielding two teams so he would have to be one of the top two in the NFC.
Actually, the All Pro team is distinct from, and should not be confused with the Pro Bowl selections. The latter of which involves two teams, one for each conference, which consist of the best players at their position. The All Pro first team is sort of like the next level, in which a single team is built consisting of the best players in the
league. So, on that basis, you would have to agree that he is among the two best DTs in the NFL right now.
This means that Suh would be in the top two among these 6 players:
1) Haloti Ngata, Baltimore
2) Vince Wilfork, New England
3) Richard Seymour, Oakland
4) Ndamukong Suh, Detroit
5) Jay Ratliff, Dallas
6) Justin Smith, San Francisco
I would say that concept is a
little surprising, though not as disgustingly shocking as Dirk made it seem. I would respectfully suggest that Suh's selection is partly a result of the fact that it's been a relatively quiet year for DTs in the NFL. No one really stood out as exceedingly dominant. On the other hand, I can think of many defensive ends that had big years, though. (Freeney, Peppers, Abraham, etc.)