Finally watched all the game.

[BigRedPowerWagon]

As i said before i worked a double the night before and only watched up until the half. I would say a couple calls were questionalble but they also happened in our own territory which didnt help at all. It seemed in the 1st half though they were hanging in with them. I agree i still dont think we would of won the game but i think we had a good game plan. If we didnt give them so much in our redzone it wouldnt of been the schlacking it ended up being. I mean we kept robinson somewhat under control. It definately wasent as bad as i thought it could of been.

 

[HotGrillonGrillAction]

I think the first half was phantom 'good' - meaning - it looked a lot better than it was. Michigan has us right where they wanted us on both sides of the ball...especially their d vs our o.

 

[Stickney]

I think the first half was phantom 'good' - meaning - it looked a lot better than it was. Michigan has us right where they wanted us on both sides of the ball...especially their d vs our o.

That.

The first half showed what Mich wanted to do.

Bo and Staff have done a far poorer job at half-time adjustments this year (Marvin? Watson?).

 

[bdubb75]

There were some back-breaking calls that didn't go our way but with our offense, I never feel 'good'. It's always inconsistent and seemingly feast or famine. Throw in Taylor making some bad decisions and some poorly thrown balls...then it's over. I wish we had a better offensive identity. At one point we had 13 minutes for ToP and they had like 33? That is never a good thing unless you're scoring on every play. Throw in a missed offensive pass interference and 'ROUGHING' the punter and we're getting blown out. Oh, and like 3-4 fumbles in the 4th quarter to really make it ugly.

 

[Joe_5700]

Did anyone else notice the holding and blocks in the back that were never called when it was a 10-10 tie and Michigan had that long drive?

 

[HotGrillonGrillAction]

I think the first half was phantom 'good' - meaning - it looked a lot better than it was. Michigan has us right where they wanted us on both sides of the ball...especially their d vs our o.

That.

The first half showed what Mich wanted to do.

Bo and Staff have done a far poorer job at half-time adjustments this year (Marvin? Watson?).

I dunno.....I feel like halftime adjustments have been one of the brighter sides of the season for the huskers this year. This one wasn't good thought.

 

[Stickney]

I think the first half was phantom 'good' - meaning - it looked a lot better than it was. Michigan has us right where they wanted us on both sides of the ball...especially their d vs our o.

That.

The first half showed what Mich wanted to do.

Bo and Staff have done a far poorer job at half-time adjustments this year (Marvin? Watson?).

I dunno.....I feel like halftime adjustments have been one of the brighter sides of the season for the huskers this year. This one wasn't good thought.

NW made some very good adjustments. Also, NU appeared to make none, even though it was pretty evident after the first quarter what NW wanted to do. PSU also made some adjustments in the second half and nearly won. The OSU -- great comeback, but the injury to their QB was significant. WI, game over at half. WA played well in the 2nd.

MSU and MINN were fine.

 

[Huskerlambs]

Half time adjustments have nothing to do with fumbling kickoff returns and running into the kicker. We made too many mistakes; it wasn't coaching.